[109112] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [tlhIngan Hol] -lI': intentional or not?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Lieven)
Tue Feb 28 11:51:55 2017
X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
From: Lieven <levinius@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 17:51:49 +0100
In-Reply-To: <CA+7zAmOBLtJnDN62SWi_hkhzCoz2t01rZuEdif7v0MO0rJ+fHQ@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org
> On 27 February 2017 at 14:41, Lieven <levinius@gmx.de> wrote:
>> I certainly do know that we can never be 100% sure without help from Maltz
>> or canon examples, but in this case, as long as we don't have better
>> examples, I keep feeling that {Heghta'} only makes sense in the Heghbat
>> Ritual.
Am 28.02.2017 um 17:38 schrieb De'vID:
> HIvchu'mo' Heghta'.
You mean like {targh vIHIvchu'mo', Heghta' targh}?
Still looks strange to me.
Lieven.
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
