[109110] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [tlhIngan Hol] -lI': intentional or not?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (De'vID)
Tue Feb 28 11:38:46 2017
X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
In-Reply-To: <090d061f-c51c-3bc8-a27c-c3d7490bbffb@gmx.de>
From: "De'vID" <de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 17:38:43 +0100
To: tlhIngan-Hol <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org
On 27 February 2017 at 14:41, Lieven <levinius@gmx.de> wrote:
> I certainly do know that we can never be 100% sure without help from Maltz
> or canon examples, but in this case, as long as we don't have better
> examples, I keep feeling that {Heghta'} only makes sense in the Heghbat
> Ritual.
HIvchu'mo' Heghta'.
--
De'vID
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
