[108607] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [tlhIngan Hol] Hoch context law' puS construction
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (SuStel)
Tue Dec 27 09:36:53 2016
X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
From: SuStel <sustel@trimboli.name>
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2016 09:36:20 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CAP7F2cJQZ=0u23a+8s4dHgGxHZpn4aM9R3w=6syfH_9jXi2UFA@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--===============2659210733055757566==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="------------7914A2D41EF2FD0E041EEA25"
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------7914A2D41EF2FD0E041EEA25
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On 12/27/2016 9:29 AM, mayqel qunenoS wrote:
> but if our intention is to use the law' puS in its comparative form,
> then would you accept in the formula: {A X law' B X puS}, the {B}
> (singular or plural) being in relation to a {Hoch} (either before, or
> after) ?
>
> with our intention being to form a comparative, would you accept {A X
> law' Hoch B(mey) X puS}, or {A X law' B(mey) Hoch X puS} ?
Yes. Logically, they may mean the same thing, but they are two different
ways of saying that thing.
*SuvwI''e' SoH Dun law' Hoch Dun puS
*/you are the greatest warrior/
*SoH Dun law' Hoch latlh SuvwI' Dun puS
*/you are greater than every other warrior/
Even in English these are said two different ways.
--
SuStel
http://trimboli.name
--------------7914A2D41EF2FD0E041EEA25
Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 12/27/2016 9:29 AM, mayqel qunenoS
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAP7F2cJQZ=0u23a+8s4dHgGxHZpn4aM9R3w=6syfH_9jXi2UFA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="auto">but if our intention is to use the law' puS in its
comparative form, then would you accept in the formula: {A X
law' B X puS}, the {B} (singular or plural) being in relation to
a {Hoch} (either before, or after) ?</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">with our intention being to form a comparative,
would you accept <span style="font-family:sans-serif">{A X law'
Hoch B(mey) X puS}, or </span><span
style="font-family:sans-serif">{A X law' B(mey) Hoch X puS} ?</span></div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<p>Yes. Logically, they may mean the same thing, but they are two
different ways of saying that thing.</p>
<p><b>SuvwI''e' SoH Dun law' Hoch Dun puS<br>
</b><i>you are the greatest warrior</i></p>
<p><b>SoH Dun law' Hoch latlh SuvwI' Dun puS<br>
</b><i>you are greater than every other warrior</i></p>
<p>Even in English these are said two different ways.<br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
</body>
</html>
--------------7914A2D41EF2FD0E041EEA25--
--===============2659210733055757566==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
--===============2659210733055757566==--
