[5605] in RedHat Linux List

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: teTeX vs. LaTeX 2e

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Otto Hammersmith)
Fri Nov 22 16:14:37 1996

From: Otto Hammersmith <ohammers@cu-online.com>
To: redhat-list@redhat.com
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 1996 15:11:03 -0600 (CST)
In-Reply-To: <199611222037.OAA23373@gxl.woodtech.com> from "Mike Wilkerson" at Nov 22, 96 02:37:51 pm
Resent-From: redhat-list@redhat.com
Reply-To: redhat-list@redhat.com

Mike Wilkerson wrote:
> 
> Hello, fellow Red Hat uiars!
> with it.  Does the LaTeX package comply to LaTeX 2e, or 2.09?  If
> it's not 2e, does anyone have any good advice on where I should get
> a current LaTeX package? 

It's LaTeX2e.  However, it's not the most recent one (I don't think)
from this past August.  It's the release of teTeX before that.  There
may be newer RPMs on ftp.redhat.com and there is a newer teTeX
package out there.

-- 
					-Otto


--
  PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
  ________________________________________________________________________
  http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ   http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-Errata
  http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-Tips  http://www.redhat.com/mailing-lists
  ------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe redhat-list-request@redhat.com < /dev/null


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post