[5602] in RedHat Linux List
RE: teTeX vs. LaTeX 2e
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Stuart Luppescu)
Fri Nov 22 16:11:01 1996
In-Reply-To: <199611222037.OAA23373@gxl.woodtech.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 1996 15:07:20 -0600 (CST)
From: Stuart Luppescu <s-luppescu@uchicago.edu>
To: redhat-list@redhat.com
Cc: Mike Wilkerson <milux@gxl.woodtech.com>
Resent-From: redhat-list@redhat.com
Reply-To: redhat-list@redhat.com
On 22-Nov-96 Mike Wilkerson wrote:
>>Hello, fellow Red Hat uiars!
>with it. Does the LaTeX package comply to LaTeX 2e, or 2.09? If it's not 2e,
>does anyone have any good advice on where I should get a current LaTeX package?
Of course, teTex complies with LaTeX2e. It's completely up-to-date. It's very complete
and works fine. I just completed my Ph.D. dissertation using it.
______________________________________________________________________
Stuart Luppescu | ``The keys to success are honesty and
University of Chicago |fair dealing. If you can fake those,
s-luppescu@uchicago.edu | you've got it made.'' --Groucho(?)
:MJ8 $HCRF`H~$NIc(EUC) | [Finger for PGP public key]
>> Sent on 11/22/96 at 15:07:22 with xfmail
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
________________________________________________________________________
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-Errata
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-Tips http://www.redhat.com/mailing-lists
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe redhat-list-request@redhat.com < /dev/null
