[101820] in RedHat Linux List
Re: RH 5.2 - 2.0.36-0.7 vs: 2.0.36
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (J.D.)
Sun Nov 29 17:30:54 1998
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 1998 15:28:45 -0700
From: "J.D." <jeff_k@usa.net>
To: redhat-list@redhat.com
Mail-Followup-To: redhat-list@redhat.com
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.981129165221.11883A-100000@mercury.area54.net>; from Michael on Sun, Nov 29, 1998 at 04:56:35PM -0500
Resent-From: redhat-list@redhat.com
Reply-To: redhat-list@redhat.com
Quoting Michael (michael@area54.net):
> On Sun, 29 Nov 1998, Brett Jones wrote:
>
> > Your kidding! I just looked before I sent that reply out. Wow things
> > move fast.
>
> kernel-2.0.36-1.i386.rpm & friends are on updates.redhat.com but not
> listed in the errata..
> ftp://updates.redhat.com/5.2/i386/
Could these .rpm's be safely applied to a 5.1 system, just for the sake of
the newer kernel??
Thanks,
jdk
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com http://archive.redhat.com
To unsubscribe: mail redhat-list-request@redhat.com with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject.
