[2170] in linux-scsi channel archive

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: SCSI black/whitelist entry

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Leonard N. Zubkoff)
Thu Jul 17 19:52:37 1997

Date: 	Thu, 17 Jul 1997 12:23:34 -0700
From: "Leonard N. Zubkoff" <lnz@dandelion.com>
To: iwj@ncipher.com
CC: drew@colorado.edu, eric@aib.com, linux-scsi@vger.rutgers.edu
In-reply-to: <m0wonV4-000yqKC@scarp.ncipher.com> (message from Ian Jackson on
	Thu, 17 Jul 1997 11:09:30 +0100 (BST))

  Date: 	Thu, 17 Jul 1997 11:09:30 +0100 (BST)
  From: Ian Jackson <iwj@ncipher.com>

  (Hi.  I am the same Ian Jackson as used to maintain the FAQ, &c, but
  I'm mailing you wrt my employer's business today.)

  We manufacture a SCSI processor device (for hardware acceleration of
  cryptography) which needs to use LUNs 0 and 1.  By default of course
  Linux doesn't probe beyond LUN 0.  We can get our users to set the
  max_scsi_luns or CONFIG_SCSI_MULTI_LUN, but it would be much better if
  we could have an entry added to the table in scsi.c to have Linux
  probe the remaining LUNs automatically.

  I'd therefore be grateful if you would include the following patch in
  forthcoming releases (including any new 2.0.x release, if you feel it
  appropriate).

  If you're not the appropriate people to mail please redirect me.

I'm actually the appropriate person these days.  Your patch looks entirely
reasonable for both 2.0.x and 2.1.x in my opinion, and I've forwarded it to
Linus for inclusion.

		Leonard

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post