[1325] in linux-scsi channel archive
Re: Any preferences for PCI SCSI controllers? Or is this a religious issue?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (kagel@quasar.bloomberg.com)
Mon Jan 27 13:51:36 1997
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 1997 13:20:15 -0500
From: kagel@quasar.bloomberg.com
To: dth@cistron.nl
Cc: submit-linux-dev-scsi@ratatosk.yggdrasil.com
In-Reply-To: <5cirlk$usi@picard.cistron.nl> (dth@cistron.nl)
Reply-To: kagel@dg1.bloomberg.com
Errors-To: postmaster@ns1
Path: not-for-mail
From: dth@cistron.nl (Danny ter Haar)
Newsgroups: linux.dev.scsi
Date: 27 Jan 1997 19:20:36 +0100
Organization: Cistron Internet Services
Lines: 20
References: <9701271749.AA12105@quasar.bloomberg.com>
X-Submitted-Via: news@ratatosk.yggdrasil.com (linux.* gateway)
Sender: owner-linux-scsi@vger.rutgers.edu
Precedence: bulk
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 614
<kagel@quasar.bloomberg.com> wrote:
>
>Does anyone have any strong recommendations for or against the:
>
>ADAPTEC 2940UW
>BUSLOGIC BT-958
>
We are an ISP and using Linux for all tasks.
We have both controllers and we _prefer_ buslogic.
It's more stable for us under heavy load.
>Can the driver handle a root partition on SCSI ID 1 (my MS-DOS C: drive is on
>drive ID 0 so...)?
Yes, no problem.
Thanks. That's two votes for the BusLogic. Adaptec 0.
--
Art S. Kagel, kagel@quasar.bloomberg.com
A proverb is no proverb to you 'till life has illustrated it. -- John Keats
