[2255] in linux-net channel archive
Re: NameD and Telnet
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Alan Cox)
Tue Mar 26 05:21:08 1996
From: Alan Cox <alan@cymru.net>
To: zap@kraken.port-aransas.k12.tx.us (James G. Stallings II -- NetAdmin)
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 1996 10:08:31 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: ATPlack@scj.com, linux-admin@vger.rutgers.edu, linux-net@vger.rutgers.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.91.960325224547.20418D-100000@kraken.port-aransas.k12.tx.us> from "James G. Stallings II -- NetAdmin" at Mar 25, 96 11:01:57 pm
> I do think it interesting to observe the difference that the Sun netra
> makes, and to wonder if there is something incredibly "less than optimum"
> about the port of "named" for linux.
I doubt it. The Linux named is the current one. No funny port, no magic. The
same code that sits on big boxes at the root name servers, that hammers out
the billions of uunet domains..
Interesting if people have any other equivalent cases however.
Alan
