[4286] in SIPB bug reports
Re: websterd
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jonathan I. Kamens)
Wed Dec 8 12:35:08 1993
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 1993 12:33:12 -0500
From: "Jonathan I. Kamens" <jik@security.ov.com>
To: yandros@MIT.EDU
Cc: marthag@MIT.EDU, charon-maintainers@MIT.EDU, bug-sipb@MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: <9312081728.AA00661@deathtongue.MIT.EDU> (message from Chad Brown on Wed, 08 Dec 93 12:28:15 EST)
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 93 12:28:15 EST
From: Chad Brown <yandros@MIT.EDU>
I'll send mail to hesreq about the sloc changes, but I have one question
first. Should I ask them to remove snork when they add charon, or
should we leave webster on snork until it goes away?
I'd say have snork removed, just because.
Just because why? Is the webster server on snork causing any
problems? If not, why not just leave it? It's certainly useful to
have three webster servers rather than two.
Incidentally, back when pit-manager was in E40, we had a webster
server in E40, which made the service more reliable for two reasons:
(1) more servers; (2) more reliability in case of network
partitioning. It would be useful to try to find a watchmaker to let
us run a webster server on his/her machine in E40 again.
jik
