[6291] in Release_7.7_team

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: MIT Scheme

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (William Cattey)
Mon Mar 16 00:21:51 2009

Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753.1)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <C3FDD1F6-D91C-4D87-8C5A-DDDE040E7651@mit.edu>
Cc: Evan Broder <broder@mit.edu>, release-team@mit.edu
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: William Cattey <wdc@MIT.EDU>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 00:21:10 -0400
To: Alex T Prengel <alexp@mit.edu>
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.00

Alex,

Evan's new (working and un-kludged) build of mit-scheme has been  
accepted into Jaunty.
He has asked for an "SRU" stable release update, which would add his  
mit-scheme into Intrepid.

We've still got the "recommends mit-scheme mit-scheme-doc" in the  
thirdparty package.

Worst case, mit-scheme will get installed on Jaunty systems when we  
take debathena through that step.
However, the Ubuntu Launchpad Bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/ 
341832 seems to currently imply that getting that SRU is very  
likely.  At that point mit-scheme will just work there too.

Simple answer to your query: Yes.  Let's leave it in debathena- 
thirdparty, and wait for the bug fix to make its way through the  
upstream process into our systems.

-Bill

> From: Alex T Prengel <alexp@MIT.EDU>
> Date: March 10, 2009 2:59:32 PM EDT
> To: Evan Broder <broder@MIT.EDU>
> Cc: alexp@MIT.EDU, release-team@MIT.EDU
> Subject: Re: MIT Scheme
>
>
>
>> Making an mit-scheme package that works for current Ubuntu was
>> non-trivial, but easier than I expected.
>>
>
>
>> I suspect that, if we're lucky, this could hit intrepid-backports  
>> some
>> time before the end of April
>>
>
> So I presume we should wait until this comes back from Ubuntu, right?
>
> I had requested this as part of debathena-thirdparty- is that where  
> it should
> stay?
>
>                                        Alex
>


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post