[1492] in Public-Access_Computer_Systems_Forum

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

RE: Incompatibility among Library Catalogs on the Internet

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (PEMMONS%WCU.BITNET@mitvma.mit.edu)
Thu Oct 15 17:54:49 1992

Date:         Thu, 15 Oct 1992 16:26:59 CDT
Reply-To: Public-Access Computer Systems Forum <PACS-L%UHUPVM1.BITNET@mitvma.mit.edu>
From: PEMMONS%WCU.BITNET@mitvma.mit.edu
To: Multiple recipients of list PACS-L <PACS-L%UHUPVM1.BITNET@mitvma.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To:  Your message of 10/13/92 15:33

----------------------------Original message----------------------------
 Hannah King's points about users' frustrations using other OPACs are
 particularly well taken when they concern hardware or software mismatches
 resulting in malfunctions.

 However, "time taken to unravel" the powers of a different OPAC is a type of
 problem hardly unique to electronic media. When not in a position to do all of
 an inquirer's work for him and present him with a pre-packaged answer to his
 question, it is quite in order for a librarian to refer him to one or more
 promising reference works. The challenge of becoming familiar with its
 organization, format, abbreviation schemes, etc. is, it seems to me, quite
 analogous to learning one's way around an OPAC. The chief requirement in each
 situation is a modicum of curiosity and patience instead of expecting instant
 gratification. If a patron is inclined to blame the librarian or the library
 for the slightest difficulty encountered, I guess that he will do it as quickly
 in the one situation as in the other.

 Paul Emmons, West Chester University

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post