[10832] in Public-Access_Computer_Systems_Forum

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

FINS

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Public-Access Computer Systems For)
Mon Nov 18 21:58:26 1996

Date: Mon, 18 Nov 1996 12:33:32 -0600 (CST)
From: Public-Access Computer Systems Forum <LIBPACS@UHUPVM1.UH.EDU>
To: Multiple recipients of list PACS-L <PACS-L@UHUPVM1.UH.EDU>
Reply-To: Public-Access Computer Systems Forum <PACS-L@UHUPVM1.UH.EDU>

From: Vigdor Schreibman - FINS <fins@access.digex.net>
Subject: Electric Minds
-------Republication is Authorized Only When Message is Kept Intact-------

FINS: Communicating the Emerging Philosophy of The Information Age
FEDERAL INFORMATION NEWS SYNDICATE
Vol IV, Issue No. 24 (116 lines)                          November 18, 1996


CLOSING THE "VALUES-GAP":
Electric Minds
By Vigdor Schreibman

                 Steve Cisler, at Apple Library of the Future, reports that
               Howard Rheingold, author of The Virtual Community (1993),
               established, "Electric Minds," on the web, Nov 11, 1996 [Fins-
               VCL-08].  As previously mentioned, David Bohm, a quantum
               physicist, says that human thought is largely a "collective
               phenomenon," drawing an analogy between the "collective
               properties of particles and the way in which thought works"
               [Fins-NC4-23].  So what can one say of thought particles
               generated in digital code, by "electric minds" in cyberspace?

                 The driving principles generated by the thought particles in
               Electric Minds are easy to grasp. Computers have made possible
               institutions that are far more complex than human beings are
               capable of dealing with and in lots of ways computers have
               "junked up the intellectual atmosphere."  Consumers are
               overwhelmingly interested in superficiality and glitz,
               quantity over quality, shallowness, which computer glitz
               machines, have exacerbated, brewing "an intellectual and
               cultural disaster."  Scientifically it is just the opposite.
               "The science of computation has turned the world of science
               upside down ... In technical, engineering, and scientific
               contexts, computers have outstripped our wildest dreams, but
               socially and culturally they have been a catastrophe."

                 Now here is the crucial question that divides the winners
               from the losers in this game: "Why has science made use of the
               power of computers in a methodical and disciplined way to
               learn a tremendous amount, and society by and large hasn't? "
               The answer to this question is the simple fact, overwhelmingly
               confirmed throughout the Net, that "science and engineering
               are more disciplined communities than society in general."

                 The dichotomies emerging from this situation are incredible.
               On the one hand, computer programs "mining" information for
               computer-age behemoths, with great discipline, have creamed
               the field.  They are restructuring the workplace for machines,
               ending gainful employment opportunities and protection of
               privacy, enlarging corrosive propaganda and harmful commercial
               exploitation, raking in all the benefits for themselves, and
               bringing into serious question, this nation's devotion to the
               cause that "government of the people, by the people, for the
               people, shall not perish from the earth" [Fins-PaN-15].
                 On the other hand, those citizens of cyberspace who are
               genuinely concerned by such matters have yet to see realized
               any program of coherently managed dialogue on the Net, with
               regard to controversial matters of importance to the community
               or society-at-large.  Indeed, while industry groups regularly
               pump out highly disciplined public policy statements designed
               to advance their narrow self-interests in the emerging Global
               Information Infrastructure, there remains no articulation of
               a design to support the public interest in that vital utility.

                 Even when plans are laid, purportedly to serve the public,
               what is usually being served are the computer vendors.  For
               example, when President Clinton announces that his dream is
               for every twelve-year-old to have access to the Internet -
               what Electric Minds discern is something "utterly bizarre."

                    Where in the United States would you find one person in
                    his right mind who'd assert that the problem with our
                    schools is not enough data. "If only we could give
                    students access to bigger databases."  It is bizarrely
                    irrelevant to the massive failures of education today. In
                    that way, the Internet has been a disaster because it is
                    a distraction. It is blatantly irrelevant, but impossible
                    to ignore; just by saying the word you get points for
                    being virtuous.

                 At the Cyberspace Society list, which I manage, we have been
               attempting for a year to articulate a better vision for the
               future free from the constraints of capitalist market fictions
               [Fins-CS-02].  What seems most shocking about that effort is
               the level of sustained silence from the assembled lurkers.
               Yet this is an old story.  Civic inquiry and actions in
               cyberspace, like the real world of antidemocratic business
               propaganda systems, are constrained by core beliefs that are
               "the product of a rigged, lopsided competition of ideas," as
               described by Yale professor of political economy, Charles E.
               Lindblom in his classic, Politics and Markets 211-212 (1977).

                 Thought particles generated in digital code, by "electric
               minds" in global cyberspace, are all driven by the same old
               pool of value systems, their computer glitz notwithstanding.
               Unless the people break free in cyberspace from the new age
               business propaganda systems, they remain trapped in an ever
               intensifying cycle of failure.  Publicly supported channels
               for civic thought and communications--freely conveyed by
               citizens of democracy--are the most likely antidote for
               society's disorders, fast declining out of human control.

============================================================================
dNII Now!  ESTABLISHMENT OF A DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL INFORMATION INFRASTRUCTURE
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
GET 24 issues of your own email copy of Fins News Column + Special Reports
+ Fins Information Age Library + Internet Press Gallery Project, for $2.95.
Payment for subscription by check or money order. Include your email address.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Federal Information News Syndicate, Vigdor Schreibman, Editor & Publisher,
18 - 9th Street NE #206, Washington, DC 20002-6042.  Copyright 1996 FINS.
Internet: fins@access.digex.net.  Browse Fins Information Age Library at the
inforM system of the University of Maryland. HTTP: //www.inform.umd.edu:
8080/EdRes/Topic/CompResource/CompSoc/FINS/; Gopher to inform.umd.edu:
EdRes/Topic/CompResource/CompSoc/FINS/.
============================================================================

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post