[33528] in RISKS Forum
Risks Digest 34.56
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (RISKS List Owner)
Sun Feb 16 15:27:33 2025
From: RISKS List Owner <risko@csl.sri.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2025 12:27:18 PST
To: risks@mit.edu
RISKS-LIST: Risks-Forum Digest Sunday 16 Feb 2025 Volume 34 : Issue 56
ACM FORUM ON RISKS TO THE PUBLIC IN COMPUTERS AND RELATED SYSTEMS (comp.risks)
Peter G. Neumann, founder and still moderator
***** See last item for further information, disclaimers, caveats, etc. *****
This issue is archived at <http://www.risks.org> as
<http://catless.ncl.ac.uk/Risks/34.56>
The current issue can also be found at
<http://www.csl.sri.com/users/risko/risks.txt>
Contents:
UK Kicks Apple's Door Open for China (WSJ)
Trump firings cause chaos at agency responsible for America's nuclear
weapons (NPR)
Lies, Damned Lies and Trumpflation (Paul Krugman)
Government Tech Workers Forced to Defend Projects to Random Elon Musk Bros
(WiReD)
The Government's Computing Experts Say They're Terrified (The Atlantic)
AI chatbots unable to accurately summarise news (BBC)
AI can now replicate itself -- a milestone that has experts terrified
(Space)
Ex-Google boss fears AI could be used by terrorists (BBC)
Dear, did you say pastry? meet the AI granny driving scammers up the wall
(The Guardian)
DeepSeek redefines who'll control AI (David Wamsley, Susmit Jha)
Canadian residents are racing to save the data in Trump's crosshairs (CBC)
Hiding the Fatal Motor Vehicle Crash Record (data-science)
Government Accountability Office report on IT challenges (PGN)
No squirrels? Monkeys will do! (BBC)
ChatGPT may not be as power-hungry as once assumed (techcrunch)
Hollywood writers say AI is ripping off their work. They want studios
to sue (Steve Bacher)
Re: UK slaps Technical Capacity Notice on Apple requiring Law
Enforcement access to encrypted cloud data (Julian Bradfield)
Abridged info on RISKS (comp.risks)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 11:22:05 PST
From: Peter Neumann <neumann@csl.sri.com>
Subject: UK Kicks Apple's Door Open for China (WSJ)
[Here's a very nice follow-up to
UK slaps Technical Capacity Notice on Apple requiring Law
Enforcement access to encrypted cloud data (WashPost)
RISKS-34.55. PGN]
Matt Green and Alex Stamos, WSJ, UK Kicks Apple's Door Open for China, WSJ,
https://www.wsj.com/opinion/u-k-kicks-apples-door-open-for-china-encryption-data-protection-deb4bc2b
The UK has ordered Apple <https://www.wsj.com/market-data/quotes/AAPL> to
build a backdoor that would allow the British government to download and
read the private encrypted data of any iPhone user anywhere in the
world. This would be a massive downgrade in the security features that
protect the privacy of billions of people and that made Apple one of the
world's most valuable companies.
Congress must immediately enact a law prohibiting American tech companies
from providing encryption backdoors to any country. This would create a
*conflict of laws* situation, allowing Apple to fight this order in UK
courts and protect Americans' safety and security. The UK government’s
demand comes at a peak of global cyber conflict. Hackers from Russia
continue to run roughshod over businesses, demanding millions of dollars in
ransom to return access to computers and data. The Chinese Ministry of
State Security successfully hacked most major U.S. telecom providers and the
U.S. Treasury. They even targeted Mr. Trump and the Kamala Harris
<https://www.wsj.com/topics/person/kamala-harris> campaign. Following these
attacks on our national security, the Federal Bureau of Investigation
reversed its hostility toward end-to-end encryption and recommended that
Americans use encrypted message applications to protect themselves against
foreign adversaries.
The UK law, colloquially known as the *snooper's charter*, grants the
British government unprecedented power to compel tech companies to
weaken the security of the devices Americans use every day. Other
countries have attempted to regulate encryption in ways that would
compromise the security of users worldwide, but the major U.S. tech
companies have refused to build features for either democratic or
autocratic governments that would make encryption worthless to
consumers.
This order from the UK threatens to blow a hole in that stance, and
not only for Apple. The strength of end-to-end encryption comes from
the idea that security is based on math, not politics. Apple designed
iCloud with an *advanced data protection* mode that makes data
impossible for anyone but the user to retrieve. Google does the same
for Android backups, while WhatsApp, Signal and Apple Messages provide
similar security for chats. Yet once one country demands an exception
to encryption, the decision about who can access data becomes
political. To Apple, China is much more important than the UK; it's a
much larger market and the place where most Apple devices are
manufactured. If the British crack the encryption door an inch, the
Chinese will kick it open.
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2025 01:55:14 -0500
From: Gabe Goldberg <gabe@gabegold.com>
Subject: Trump firings cause chaos at agency responsible for America's
nuclear weapons (NPR)
Scenes of confusion and chaos unfolded over the last two days at the
civilian agency that oversees the nation's nuclear weapons stockpile, as the
Trump administration's mass firings were carried out before being "paused"
on Friday. [...]
Officials were given hours to fire hundreds of employees, and workers were
shut out of email as termination notices arrived. The terminations were part
of a broader group of dismissals at the Department of Energy, where
reportedly more than a thousand federal workers were terminated. It was all
a result of Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE)
initiative to slash the federal workforce and what Musk and President Trump
characterize as excessive government spending.
The NNSA is a semi-autonomous agency within the Department of Energy that
oversees the U.S. stockpile of thousands of nuclear weapons. Despite having
the words "National" and "Security" in its title, it was not getting an
exemption for national security, managers at the agency were told last
Friday, according to an employee at NNSA who asked not to be named, fearing
retribution from the Trump administration. Just days before, officials in
leadership had scrambled to write descriptions for the roughly 300
probationary employees at the agency who had joined the federal workforce
less than two years ago.
U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Public Health
Staff at CDC and NIH are reeling as Trump administration cuts workforce
Managers were given just 200 characters to explain why the jobs these
workers did mattered. [...]
On Friday, an employee still at NNSA told NPR that the firings are now
"paused," in part because of the chaotic way in which they unfolded.
Another employee had been contacted and told that their termination had been
"rescinded." But some worried the damage had already been done. Nuclear
security is highly specialized, high-pressure work, but it's not
particularly well paid, one employee told NPR. Given what's unfolded over
the past 24 hours, "why would anybody want to take these jobs?" they asked.
https://www.npr.org/2025/02/14/nx-s1-5298190/nuclear-agency-trump-firings-nnsa
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 17:23:18 -0500
From: Gabe Goldberg <gabe@gabegold.com>
Subject: Lies, Damned Lies and Trumpflation (Paul Krugman)
Paul Krugman, *The New York Times*
More DOGE hijinks: In yesterday's post [13 Feb 2025] I noted that the whole
condoms-for-Hamas thing came from DOGE staffers who confused Gaza province
in Mozambique with the Gaza Strip. Well, as one commenter pointed out, the
thing about 150-year-old Social Security beneficiaries may be another
comical error. Apparently in COBOL — obsolete in the business world but
still used in government — a missing date of birth is registered as
1875. Commenters on X and Threads say the same. So the only “fraud” here is
the pretense that Musk's child programmers have any idea what they’re doing.
https://paulkrugman.substack.com/p/lies-damned-lies-and-trumpflation
The risk? A Pulitzer Prize winning economist writing about technology.
[What's wrong with that? He has lots of fact-checkers, and he is often
right on the button. Fortunately, he seems to have learned a lot along
the way to his Pulitzer. PGN]
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 16:00:25 -0800
From: Steve Bacher <sebmb1@verizon.net>
Subject: Government Tech Workers Forced to Defend Projects to Random Elon
Musk Bros (WiReD)
More info on the guy Musk brought in to interview them. Not much about him
was known or said in the article, but he turns out to be even more of a
piece of work than they thought.
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2025 08:06:33 -0500
From: Jan Wolitzky <jan.wolitzky@gmail.com>
Subject: The Government's Computing Experts Say They're Terrified
(The Atlantic)
Elon Musk's unceasing attempts to access the data and information systems
of the federal government range so widely, and are so unprecedented and
unpredictable, that government computing experts believe the effort has
spun out of control. This week, we spoke with four federal-government IT
professionals -- all experienced contractors and civil servants who have
built, modified, or maintained the kind of technological infrastructure that
Musk's inexperienced employees at his newly created Department of Government
Efficiency are attempting to access. In our conversations, each expert was
unequivocal: They are terrified and struggling to articulate the scale of
the crisis.
https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2025/02/elon-musk-doge-security/681600/
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 06:45:19 -0700
From: Matthew Kruk <mkrukg@gmail.com>
Subject: AI chatbots unable to accurately summarise news (BBC)
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0m17d8827ko
Four major artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots are inaccurately
summarising news stories, according to research carried out by the BBC.
The BBC gave OpenAI's ChatGPT, Microsoft's Copilot, Google's Gemini and
Perplexity AI content from the BBC website then asked them questions about
the news.
It said the resulting answers contained "significant inaccuracies" and
distortions.
In a blog, Deborah Turness, the CEO of BBC News and Current Affairs, said
AI brought "endless opportunities" but the companies developing the tools
were "playing with fire".
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 08:12:01 -0800
From: Steve Bacher <sebmb1@verizon.net>
Subject: AI can now replicate itself -- a milestone that has experts terrified
(Space)
Scientists say artificial intelligence (AI) has crossed a critical "red
line" and has replicated itself. In a new study, researchers from China
showed that two popular large language models (LLMs) could clone themselves.
https://www.space.com/space-exploration/tech/ai-can-now-replicate-itself-a-milestone-that-has-experts-terrified
[Same old issue: If it is replicating itself, it is replicating all its
mistakes. That's not an improvement. PGN]
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 20:05:11 -0700
From: Matthew Kruk <mkrukg@gmail.com>
Subject: Ex-Google boss fears AI could be used by terrorists (BBC)
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c5y6eq2zxlno
The former chief executive of Google is worried artificial intelligence
could be used by terrorists or "rogue states" to "harm innocent people."
Eric Schmidt told the BBC: "The real fears that I have are not the ones that
most people talk about AI -- I talk about extreme risk."
The tech billionaire, who held senior posts at Google from 2001 to 2017,
told the Today programme "North Korea, or Iran, or even Russia" could adopt
and misuse the technology to create biological weapons.
He called for government oversight on private tech companies which are
developing AI models, but warned over-regulation could stifle innovation.
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 06:03:22 -0500
From: Jan Wolitzky <jan.wolitzky@gmail.com>
Subject: Dear, did you say pastry? meet the AI granny driving scammers
up the wall (The Guardian)
An elderly grandmother who chats about knitting patterns, recipes for
scones and the blackness of the night sky to anyone who will listen has
become an unlikely tool in combatting scammers.
Like many people, Daisy is beset with countless calls from fraudsters, who
often try to take control of her computer after claiming she has been
hacked.
But because of her dithering and inquiries about whether they like cups of
tea, the criminals end up furious and frustrated rather than successful.
Daisy is, of course, not a real grandmother but an AI bot created by
computer scientists to combat fraud. Her task is simply to waste the time of
the people who are trying to scam her.
https://www.theguardian.com/money/2025/feb/04/ai-granny-scammers-phone-fraud
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 11:38:20 PST
From: Peter Neumann <neumann@csl.sri.com>
Subject: DeepSeek redefines who'll control AI
David Wamsley, *San Francisco Chronicle*, 12 Feb 2025
DeepSeek R1 delivers ChatGPD-4-level performance at a fraction of the
cost, erasing a key assumption of AI progress.
Excerpts
For years the prevailing wisdom in Washington and Silicon Valley
rested on an article of faith: that the United States held a
commanding lead in AI. The narrative was compelling -- truly advanced
AI would remain the exclusive domain of well-funded American companies
with their proprietary data and vast computing resources.
DeepSeek didn't just challenge that narrative -- it shattered it.
We've crossed a threshold. The old playbooks -- whether for business
strategy, national policy, or career planning -- are obsolete
overnight. The future we've been preparing for isn't coming next
decade, next year, or even next quarter.
It's already here.
[But does it resolve all of the integrity and privacy issues? Also,
does it enhance Evidence-based Research? PGN]
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 20:37:05 +0000
From: Susmit Jha <susmit.jha@sri.com>
Subject: DeepSeek redefines who'll control AI
The claims of DeepSeekR1 trained on 6M is propaganda -– DeepSeekR1 spent
billions to do this, which is a consensus in the AI community. If you look
around, several blogs will do cost breakdown. From their own paper, they had
2048 H800s where each H800 cost has varied between 22K to 35K. For a
typical datacenter to train ML models, these 60M GPUs require costly
internode interconnects, NVMe high-speed disks, etc. The capital cost of
their own declared infra is in the same ballpark. Running these requires
further cost.
The salary offered by deepseek to its engineers in China was 1.3 million
dollars. So, you can estimate human resources cost.
In contrast, we offer around 150K (10x lower) salary to our starting
folks. We do not have even 1 GPU comparable to their 2048 H800.
It appears their claim of using outcome only reward model without SFT to get
reasoning which conflicts with several papers requiring PRM is a consequence
of either natural proliferation of chain of thought responses from SOTA LLMs
over the web, or an engineered implicit distillation of CoT from openai and
anthropic.
Their claim to open-source is even more ill-founded – if someone can find
their training code and data, please share. They just shared weights and
inference code. I can’t imagine why someone would call that open-source and
not open-weight as Meta and others call their models.
See this for a good analysis:
https://semianalysis.com/2025/01/31/deepseek-debates/
We should kill this propaganda and not let it spread – this could be a
misinformation campaign from a near peer adversary to make us think
investments in AI is not needed or that US is more wasteful with AI
investments – both of which is flatly completely wrong.
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 06:51:15 -0700
From: Matthew Kruk <mkrukg@gmail.com>
Subject: Canadian residents are racing to save the data in Trump's crosshairs
(CBC)
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/canada-us-medical-environmental-data-1.745=
7627
The call to Angela Rasmussen came out of the blue and posed a troubling
question. Had she heard the rumour that key data sets would be removed from
the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's website the next day?
It's something Rasmussen had thought could never happen.
"It had never really been thought of before that CDC would actually start
deleting some of these crucial public health data sets," said the
University of Saskatchewan virologist. "These data are really, really
important for everybody's health -- not just in the U.S. but around
the world."
The following day, Jan. 31, Rasmussen started to see data disappear. She
knew she needed to take action.
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 14:53:26 -0500 (EST)
From: "R. A. Whitfield" <inquiry@data-science.llc>
Subject: Hiding the Fatal Motor Vehicle Crash Record
Fatality Analysis Reporting System Vandalized by Officials at NHTSA
R.A. Whitfield, Manager, Forensic Data Science LLC
The most recently available Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) data
for the 2022 calendar year were removed from the National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration's (NHTSA's) File Downloads during the first week of
February 2022. The official explanation for this action was that the data
did not conform to President Trump's "Executive Order Defending Women from
Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal
Government."
According to a communication from NHTSA, these data and their associated
documentation "... will be reposted once it is following this Executive
Order [sic]."
It is absurd to suggest that women's lives are being "defended" by hiding
detailed information in FARS about more than eleven thousand of them who
were killed in motor vehicle crashes in the United States in 2022. If any
good can follow from such an enormous loss of life, it will come about by
studying the data to learn how similar casualties can be prevented in the
future. That can't be done if the data have been suppressed.
The connection of the FARS data with "Gender Ideology" is remote. Precisely
one person was killed in 2022 whose "SEXNAME" was coded in the FARS data as
"Other" -- instead of "Male" or "Female" -- according to a copy of the data
that was fortunately saved from the bonfire. Twenty-one "Other" persons were
involved in fatal crashes but were not themselves killed.
It is cold comfort that the data for the remaining 95,735 persons in fatal
crashes in 2022 might someday be reposted by NHTSA once the faithfulness to
the "biological truth" of these twenty-two persons' sex has been determined
and restored.
Efforts to hide the motor vehicle crash record are anti-scientific and ought
to concern manufacturers and consumers alike. In particular, concealing the
most current FARS data will impede progress toward achieving whatever safety
benefits advanced driver-assistance systems might bring. Access to data
about fatal motor vehicle crashes is a crucial tool that can be used by
researchers to shed light on the safety risks of "self-driving" technology.
Who could be opposed to this?
http://data-science.llc/fars2022.html
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 13:09:38 PST
From: Peter Neumann <neumann@csl.sri.com>
Subject: Government Accountability Office report on IT challenges
[Once upon a time (for nearly twenty years), I was on the GAO Executive
Council on Information Management and Technology, with Gene Spafford
joining a little later than I did. The GAO did an enormous job in writing
incisive reports on critical government agencies and Congress, while
trying to be objective -- although they sometimes had to lean toward cater
a little to the party that asked for the research. Amazingly, it is still
active. This is a voice that needs to survive and be heard today. PGN]
GAO Calls for Urgent Action to Address IT Acquisition and Management
Challenges, GAO, 23 Jan 2025
The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) today issued a report
updating its IT acquisitions and operations high-risk area. In this update,
GAO identified major challenges to federal IT acquisitions and management,
as well as critical actions the government needs to take to implement
effective and cost-efficient mission-critical IT systems and operations.
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2025 09:15:29 -0800
From: "Jim" <jgeissman@socal.rr.com>
Subject: No squirrels? Monkeys will do! (BBC)
Power is being gradually restored across Sri Lanka after a nationwide outage
left buildings including hospitals having to rely on generators.
Officials say it may take a few hours to get power back across the island
nation, but medical facilities and water purification plants have been given
priority.
Energy Minister Kumara Jayakody reportedly blamed a monkey for causing the
power cut, saying the animal came into "contact with our grid transformer
causing an imbalance in the system", according to the AFP news agency.
The Ceylon Electricity Board (CEB) said the power cut had been caused by an
emergency at a sub-station, south of Colombo, and gave no further details.
"Engineers are attending to it to try and restore the service as soon as
possible," the minister said.
The CEB said "we are making every effort to restore the island-wide power
failure as soon as possible".
Hospitals and businesses across the island nation of 22 million people have
been using generators or inverters.
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2025 07:51:26 -0800
From: Steve Bacher <sebmb1@verizon.net>
Subject: ChatGPT may not be as power-hungry as once assumed
ChatGPT, OpenAI’s chatbot platform, may not be as power-hungry as once
assumed. But its appetite largely depends on how ChatGPT is being used and
the AI models that are answering the queries, according to a new study.
A recent analysis by Epoch AI, a nonprofit AI research institute, attempted
to calculate how much energy a typical ChatGPT query consumes. A commonly
cited stat is that ChatGPT requires around 3 watt-hours of power to answer a
single question, or 10 times as much as a Google search.
Epoch believes that’s an overestimate.
Using OpenAI’s latest default model for ChatGPT, GPT-4o, as a reference,
Epoch found the average ChatGPT query consumes around 0.3 watt-hours — less
than many household appliances.
“The energy use is really not a big deal compared to using normal appliances
or heating or cooling your home, or driving a car,” Joshua You, the data
analyst at Epoch who conducted the analysis, told TechCrunch.
AI’s energy usage — and its environmental impact, broadly speaking — is the
subject of contentious debate as AI companies look to rapidly expand their
infrastructure footprints. Just last week, a group of over 100 organizations
published an open letter calling on the AI industry and regulators to ensure
that new AI data centers don’t deplete natural resources and force utilities
to rely on nonrenewable sources of energy.
You told TechCrunch his analysis was spurred by what he characterized as
outdated previous research. You pointed out, for example, that the author of
the report that arrived at the 3 watt-hours estimate assumed OpenAI used
older, less-efficient chips to run its models. [...]
https://techcrunch.com/2025/02/11/chatgpt-may-not-be-as-power-hungry-as-once-assumed/
(Reading this article may be confusing, as it seems to attribute a number of
statements to you, Dear Reader. Shades of Who's On First.)
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 08:10:45 -0800
From: Steve Bacher <sebmb1@verizon.net>
Subject: Hollywood writers say AI is ripping off their work. They want
studios to sue (LA Times)
Several film and TV writers say they are horrified their scripts are being
used by tech companies to train AI models without writers' permission. They
are pressuring studios to take legal action.
https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/business/story/2025-02-12/hollywood-writers-say-ai-is-ripping-off-their-work-they-want-studios-to-sue
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2025 10:27:30 +0000
From: Julian Bradfield <jcb@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: UK slaps Technical Capacity Notice on Apple requiring Law
Enforcement access to encrypted cloud data (RISKS-34.55)
All reports, like this one, conflate two things. A technical capability
notice does indeed require Apple to backdoor their security. However, it
does not require them to allow the UK authorities to "retrieve all the
content any Apple user worldwide has uploaded to the cloud". Each individual
use of the backdoor is still subject to warrant. In short, the TCN requires
Apple to make it possible for Apple to respond to a warrant.
That's quite bad enough -- it doesn't help to exaggerate things by
suggesting a massive free-for-all is proposed.
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2023 11:11:11 -0800
From: RISKS-request@csl.sri.com
Subject: Abridged info on RISKS (comp.risks)
The ACM RISKS Forum is a MODERATED digest. Its Usenet manifestation is
comp.risks, the feed for which is donated by panix.com as of June 2011.
=> SUBSCRIPTIONS: The mailman Web interface can be used directly to
subscribe and unsubscribe:
http://mls.csl.sri.com/mailman/listinfo/risks
=> SUBMISSIONS: to risks@CSL.sri.com with meaningful SUBJECT: line that
includes the string `notsp'. Otherwise your message may not be read.
*** This attention-string has never changed, but might if spammers use it.
=> SPAM challenge-responses will not be honored. Instead, use an alternative
address from which you never send mail where the address becomes public!
=> The complete INFO file (submissions, default disclaimers, archive sites,
copyright policy, etc.) has moved to the ftp.sri.com site:
<risksinfo.html>.
*** Contributors are assumed to have read te full info file for guidelines!
=> OFFICIAL ARCHIVES: http://www.risks.org takes you to Lindsay Marshall's
delightfully searchable html archive at newcastle:
http://catless.ncl.ac.uk/Risks/VL.IS --> VoLume, ISsue.
Also, ftp://ftp.sri.com/risks for the current volume/previous directories
or ftp://ftp.sri.com/VL/risks-VL.IS for previous VoLume
If none of those work for you, the most recent issue is always at
http://www.csl.sri.com/users/risko/risks.txt, and index at /risks-34.00
ALTERNATIVE ARCHIVES: http://seclists.org/risks/ (only since mid-2001)
*** NOTE: If a cited URL fails, we do not try to update them. Try
browsing on the keywords in the subject line or cited article leads.
Apologies for what Office365 and SafeLinks may have done to URLs.
==> Special Offer to Join ACM for readers of the ACM RISKS Forum:
<http://www.acm.org/joinacm1>
------------------------------
End of RISKS-FORUM Digest 34.56
************************
