[1100] in arla-drinkers
Re: is there a port for krb5 for afs?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Love)
Sun Aug 22 16:25:38 1999
From owner-arla-drinkers@stacken.kth.se Sun Aug 22 20:25:38 1999
Return-Path: <owner-arla-drinkers@stacken.kth.se>
Delivered-To: arla-drinkers-mtg@bloom-picayune.mit.edu
Received: (qmail 20654 invoked from network); 22 Aug 1999 20:25:37 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO sundance.stacken.kth.se) (130.237.234.41)
by bloom-picayune.mit.edu with SMTP; 22 Aug 1999 20:25:37 -0000
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
by sundance.stacken.kth.se (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA00878
for arla-drinkers-list; Sun, 22 Aug 1999 22:11:54 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from elixir.e.kth.se (elixir.e.kth.se [130.237.48.5])
by sundance.stacken.kth.se (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA00186
for <arla-drinkers@stacken.kth.se>; Sun, 22 Aug 1999 21:20:18 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from maxbert.e.kth.se (maxbert.e.kth.se [130.237.48.107])
by elixir.e.kth.se (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA04358;
Sun, 22 Aug 1999 21:20:15 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from lha@localhost)
by maxbert.e.kth.se (8.9.3/8.9.3) id VAA13220;
Sun, 22 Aug 1999 21:20:14 +0200 (MET DST)
To: jhall@uu.net (Jeremy Hall)
Cc: arla-drinkers@stacken.kth.se
Subject: Re: is there a port for krb5 for afs?
References: <QQhdfp24140.199908211319@neserve0.corp.us.uu.net>
From: Love <lha@stacken.kth.se>
Date: 22 Aug 1999 21:20:14 +0200
In-Reply-To: jhall@uu.net's message of "Sat, 21 Aug 1999 09:19:14 -0400 (EDT)"
Message-ID: <amso5bipw1.fsf@maxbert.e.kth.se>
Lines: 25
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0700000000000003 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.91) Emacs/20.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: owner-arla-drinkers@stacken.kth.se
Precedence: bulk
jhall@uu.net (Jeremy Hall) writes:
> I have retrieved the athena library, and some support for krb5 appears to
> be there, but it looks like it will take a signifficant amount of work to
> get the thing to use krb5.
>
> I compiled my krb5 with krb4 compatability, so I am wondering if somehow
> the "right" thing could be achieved. Has somebody attempted to do this
> already?
The rxkad we are using (from Björn Grönvall <bg@sics.se>) have support
for Kerberos5. As things are right now, there are two options.
1. Wait for transarc to write it (and document it).
2. Implement it ourself in our own fileserver.
As 2 is depending on finishing up our fileserver (that might happen soon or
not that soon, depening on how much time we have over to write the code).
And 1 I think <http://www.mit.edu:8008/menelaus/kerberos/11828> posted to
the kerberos-list explain the situtation with transarc. Guess you should
ask them what they are going to do.
Love
