[2490] in SIPB IPv6

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: [james@towardex.com: RE: OCCAID IPv6 tunnel for MIT SIPB]

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Daniel Jared Dominguez)
Thu May 18 22:57:11 2006

Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 22:56:37 -0400
From: Daniel Jared Dominguez <danjared@MIT.EDU>
To: gdt@work.lexort.com
Cc: Daniel Jared Dominguez <danjared@mit.edu>, sipbv6@mit.edu
In-Reply-To: <smu64k26h0e.fsf@linuxpal.mit.edu>


--FCuugMFkClbJLl1L
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I'd lean towards a gradual transition unless no sees the need to.

I won't have much Internet access between now and Tuesday but would like
to help with whatever I can once I'm back. While we have a chance,
perhaps we could setup another machine with NetBSD 3.0--I hear
limekiller is at 1.6--but that's probably not terribly important. If
someone can give me ssh access to limekiller (or send me the zone files
on it), I can work on adjusting .ipv6.mit.edu.

[Greg: While you're arranging for address space, would you like a tunnel
to BBN?]

Did we have any system for subnetting our 6bone prefix? Would anyone
like to volunteer to support tunnels to specific MIT subnets? I'll be
running one for my living group (18.214) and may be able to get one for
18.152. I believe kcr mentioned that he'd be willing to run a tunnel to
CSAIL. If someone can poke him, let me know; otherwise I'll contact him.
I'm assuming Ken is still going to run a tunnel to W92.

One additional thing I'd like to do is see if we can peer with NoX. How
do others feel about that?

--Jared

On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 07:38:09PM -0400, gdt@work.lexort.com wrote:
>=20
> Do we want to have a gradual cutover with both prefixes live for a
> while, or is the use really to have v6, and we might as well just flip
> everything and not worry about it being broken for a while in the
> meantime.
>=20
> Someone will need to adjust .ipv6.mit.edu.
>=20
> I can continue to support a tunnel on 18.62 (an ultra5 running NetBSD
> with quagga), which has a tunnel to BBN for peering but not for transit.
>=20
> BBN currently has a 6bone prefix, and I'm currently trying to arrange
> for production address space and connectivity.
>=20
> --=20
> 	Greg Troxel <gdt@work.lexort.com>



--=20
Daniel Jared Dominguez     617.368.0509     danjared@mit.edu
pika, 69 Chestnut Street, Cambridge Massachusetts 02139-4835
Zephyr: danjared@ATHENA.MIT.EDU     Jabber: danjared@mit.edu

--FCuugMFkClbJLl1L
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (SunOS)

iEYEARECAAYFAkRtM+UACgkQfA6WwJdNltJf8ACgoXTc5adwrv1QDFxI+pczD5E5
oLIAoI2L7zpPhVEZKyH6OsmQhfsIl1g5
=uRBV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--FCuugMFkClbJLl1L--

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post