[2489] in SIPB IPv6
Re: [james@towardex.com: RE: OCCAID IPv6 tunnel for MIT SIPB]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (gdt@work.lexort.com)
Thu May 18 19:38:28 2006
From: gdt@work.lexort.com
To: Daniel Jared Dominguez <danjared@MIT.EDU>
Cc: sipbv6@MIT.EDU, Greg Troxel <gdt@work.lexort.com>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 19:38:09 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20060518233235.GB1035@gaston.mit.edu> (Daniel Jared Dominguez's
message of "Thu, 18 May 2006 19:32:35 -0400")
--=-=-=
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Do we want to have a gradual cutover with both prefixes live for a
while, or is the use really to have v6, and we might as well just flip
everything and not worry about it being broken for a while in the
meantime.
Someone will need to adjust .ipv6.mit.edu.
I can continue to support a tunnel on 18.62 (an ultra5 running NetBSD
with quagga), which has a tunnel to BBN for peering but not for transit.
BBN currently has a 6bone prefix, and I'm currently trying to arrange
for production address space and connectivity.
=2D-=20
Greg Troxel <gdt@work.lexort.com>
--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (NetBSD)
iD8DBQFEbQVkH9p66AmO1g4RAoIRAJ9k4dQHffHIkt4U5szeQ5SPDn9kHACePhoL
tA9YMrF/sYqe+cz0SPNSNGg=
=oaW9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--
