[2589] in SIPB_Linux_Development

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Linux Locker Cleanup

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Derek Atkins)
Fri Feb 12 01:10:52 1999

To: Jose H Mercado <jmercado@MIT.EDU>
Cc: linux-dev@MIT.EDU
From: Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>
Date: 12 Feb 1999 01:10:22 -0500
In-Reply-To: Jose H Mercado's message of Thu, 11 Feb 1999 21:36:09 -0500

I would mind a lot if you got rid of the 2.1 kernels dir.  As for
3.0.3 or 4.0.0, well, I don't care all that much, but are we really
that short on space?   If so, I can think of a few things that can
go.

-derek

Jose H Mercado <jmercado@MIT.EDU> writes:

> 
> Hi.
> 
> I was looking through the locker earlier today and noticed that some
> things are *really* out of date.  I decided to do something about
> this.  I got rid of the Redhat-Manual-4.0 and replaced it with the
> version for 4.2.  I also put the 5.2 version of the manual in the
> locker.  I also noticed that the kernel directory needs ot be cleaned
> up.  Would anyone mind if I got rid of the 2.1 kernels dir?  I already
> made a dir for 2.2 placing both 2.2.0 and 2.2.1 in there.  Also, would
> anyone mind if RH Linux 3.0.3 and 4.0.0 went away.  This just seemd
> like a waste of space to me.
> 
> 
> -Jose'
> 
> 
> P.S.  If you reply to the list cc me on the reply as I was just added
> today.  Obviously this won't be a problem after the moira update tonight.

-- 
       Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
       Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board  (SIPB)
       URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/      PP-ASEL      N1NWH
       warlord@MIT.EDU                        PGP key available

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post