[1372] in SIPB_Linux_Development

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: RedHat vs. Debian

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Derek Atkins)
Mon Aug 12 17:13:41 1996

To: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@MIT.EDU>
Cc: mhpower@MIT.EDU, sit@MIT.EDU, linux-dev@MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 12 Aug 1996 16:50:58 EDT."
             <9608122050.AA12913@dcl.MIT.EDU> 
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 1996 17:13:00 EDT
From: Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>

> Both RedHat and Debian are technically quite good.  Unfortunately for
> Debian, very few people are actually using RedHat; there are many, many
> more people using RedHat.  (It's a bit quite like the situation of
> NetBSD vs. Linux, actually.  Both are technically good, and the
> technical quality is on the whole more or less the same --- however,
> many more people are using Linux.)

Umm, don't you mean that "Unfortunately for Debian, very few people
are actually using Debian; there are many many more people using
RedHat"?  Just wanted to make sure.

> Unfortunately, I won't be able to make tonight's meeting; I did want to
> make an observation of the RedHat vs. Debian question.  I think we
> should go with supporting RedHat.

This is unfortunately.  I would have liked to have you there, for
moral support if nothing else ;)

-derek

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post