[116] in SIPB_Linux_Development
No subject found in mail header
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (ghudson@athena.mit.edu)
Thu Aug 19 16:17:07 1993
From: ghudson@athena.mit.edu
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 93 16:16:39 -0400
To: linux-dev@athena.mit.edu
Cc: pshuang@athena.mit.edu
Without comment (except a little giggling, perhaps...):
comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy #12377 (9 + 781 more) [1]+-[1]
From: ed.duomo@lambada.oit.unc.edu (Cousin Ed) |-[1]
[1] NT versus Linux |-[1]
Lines: 37 \-[1]+-[1]--[1]
Date: Wed Aug 18 23:33:49 EDT 1993 |-[1]
+ |-[1]
I saw this on a local BBS, not sure if it's accurate though.
For Immdediate Release: NT versus Linux, a feature comparison
-------------------------------------------------------------
Feature NT Linux
------- -- -----
microkernel yes no (monolethic)
kernel size 50k 350k
loadable device
drivers yes no
true dynamic link
libraries (DLL) yes no
per-application DLLs yes no
integrated GUI yes no (add-on)
drag and drop yes no
DDE support yes no
max chars in file name unlimited 14
max partition size unlimited 64MB
C2 securiy yes no
memory model flat internally segmented
protable yes no (x86 only)
runs unix apps yes (source level) yes (source level)
runs DOS apps yes no
runs Windows apps yes no
max addressable mem 2048 Gig 4 Gig
multimedia support yes no
QIC-80 support yes no
min required mem 12 meg 16 meg (w/ X)
min required disk space 60 meg 120 meg (all series)
networking stable unstable
price $110 (educational) $69 (SLS)
Ed
