[6970] in testers
Re: 9.4 Linux: no locate database rebuild?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Greg Hudson)
Wed May 11 17:08:46 2005
From: Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU>
To: John Hawkinson <jhawk@mit.edu>
Cc: testers@mit.edu
In-Reply-To: <20050511191851.GR23850@multics.mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 16:58:46 -0400
Message-Id: <1115845126.3458.20.camel@egyptian-gods.mit.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 15:18 -0400, John Hawkinson wrote:
> My perception is consistent with Alex's. A fair number of users find
> it useful, and habitually try to use it (though, admittedly, some
> of them should be trying to use ``whichlocker'' instead).
Uh, how do they use it? (I assume most of these users are not using it
to search for local data they've stored themselves on the machine.)
