[6969] in testers
Re: 9.4 Linux: no locate database rebuild?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John Hawkinson)
Wed May 11 15:19:05 2005
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 15:18:51 -0400
From: John Hawkinson <jhawk@MIT.EDU>
To: testers@MIT.EDU
Message-ID: <20050511191851.GR23850@multics.mit.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200505111636.j4BGaop9022417@dit.mit.edu>
Alex T Prengel <alexp@MIT.EDU> wrote on Wed, 11 May 2005
at 12:36:50 -0400 in <200505111636.j4BGaop9022417@dit.mit.edu>:
> Well, to me it's pretty useful- especially since I store lots of
> things locally that I need to find again.
My perception is consistent with Alex's. A fair number of users find
it useful, and habitually try to use it (though, admittedly, some
of them should be trying to use ``whichlocker'' instead).
Perhaps a compromise of dropping the rebuild frequency?
--jhawk
