[5906] in testers

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Requesting solaris patches for 9.3

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ken T Takusagawa)
Fri Jun 4 16:51:37 2004

Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2004 16:51:35 -0400 (EDT)
From: Ken T Takusagawa <kenta@MIT.EDU>
To: Robert A Basch <rbasch@MIT.EDU>
cc: testers@MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: <1086374810.658.16.camel@anhedonia.mit.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58L.0406041630200.2162@quiche-lorraine.mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

Unfortunately all I can quickly provide is

http://www.mit.edu/~kenta/Screenshot-mozillapatch.png

which is the friendly popup from recent prebuilt Solaris
binaries.

The lack of these patches do not cause Mozilla to
immediately crash.

For 112785-34 I did a little digging in CVS, and the only
comment I could find is "bring Solaris patchchecker
current".

http://bonsai.mozilla.org/cvslog.cgi?file=mozilla/xpfe/bootstrap/init.d/moz_patch_checker.dtksh&rev=1.3

--ken


On Fri, 4 Jun 2004, Robert A Basch wrote:

> On Wed, 2004-06-02 at 02:07, Ken T Takusagawa wrote:
> > I maintain mozilla-beta in the mozilla locker.  I'd like to
> > request that the following Solaris patches be included in
> > 9.3 (new versions of mozilla seem to want them):
> >
> > 113902-03
> > 114276-02
> > 114641-02
>
> These seem to be patches to packages containing the Asian iconv
> modules for UTF-8, and Arabic fonts, none of which we currently
> have in the release.  The corresponding packages (in /install/cdrom)
> seem to include these patch revisions, so, if you really need these,
> we should only have to add the packages to the release.  Can you
> please be more specific about your needs here?
>
> > 112785-34
>
> We currently have 112785-33 in the release (the latest rev of this
> patch is 35).  Is there a specific bug you are encountering that
> is fixed in the later rev of the patch?
>
> Bob
>
>

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post