[1267] in testers
Re: flames about update procedure
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU)
Fri Nov 30 11:34:02 1990
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 90 11:33:38 -0500
To: qjb@MIT.EDU
Cc: epeisach@MIT.EDU, testers@MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: Emanuel 'Jay' Berkenbilt's message of Thu, 29 Nov 90 21:00:44 -0500,
From: Richard Basch <probe@MIT.EDU>
From: qjb@ATHENA.MIT.EDU
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 90 21:00:44 -0500
I've had a /.k file since some release in the 6's and this is
the first time update has ever complained about it.
/.k is now an exception... The new non-standard checks in 7.2 are a
little bit more thorough than in previous releases (and in fact, it did
indeed catch some cruft I had forgotten about on my workstation when I
first updated to 7.2).
We are indeed most interested in hearing about exceptions that we may
have forgotten.
-Richard
