[120] in Enterprise Print Delivery Team
AFP vs PS on IP60
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Bob Couch)
Wed Mar 8 12:28:15 2000
Resent-From: "David F. Lambert" <LAMBERT@mitvma.mit.edu>
Resent-To: Enterprise Printing Delivery Project Team <printdel@MIT.EDU>
From: "Bob Couch" <bcouch@NEPS.Com>
To: lambert@mitvma.mit.edu
Cc: "Norm Brien" <nbrien@NEPS.Com>
Message-Id: <8525689C.0059C820.00@SMTP.NEPS.Com>
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2000 11:21:42 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Team,
Below you'll find some transformation performance info. It's
just meant to be a sample to give us some idea of the overhead
associated with transformations.
-Dave
----------------------------Original message----------------------------
Hi Dave,
Here is the detail on transform performance for a 100 page simplex job.
Thanks,
Bob
---------------------- Forwarded by Bob Couch/NEPS/MOORE on 03/08/2000
11:20 AM ---------------------------
Al Seymour
03/08/2000 11:17 AM
To: Bob Couch/NEPS/MOORE@MOORECORP
cc:
Subject: AFP vs PS on IP60
Simplex job, 100 pages
2 Runs of each
Timed from LPR Enter key till last page hits output stacker.
AFP Total run time #1 2:05:34
Total run time #2 2:05:18
Time from job in queue to Printer starts ~20 sec for both
PS Total run time #1 2:45:96
Total run time #2 2:44:61
Time from ripping in queue till printer start 48 sec both
Time from ripping stop to Printing status 1:55+-
