[266] in peace2

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Good news on Bio-piracy front!

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Aimee L Smith)
Sun May 14 22:14:17 2000

Message-Id: <200005150214.WAA14318@mint-square.mit.edu>
To: peace-list@MIT.EDU
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 22:14:09 -0400
From: Aimee L Smith <alsmith@MIT.EDU>

Victory claimed on neem patent issue 

India Abroad News Service 

Thursday, May 11, 2000 

New Delhi, May 11 - An Indian organisation campaigning against biopiracy 
has claimed a major victory with the European Patent Office (EPO) revoking 
a patent it granted to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the 
multinational firm W.R. Grace for a fungicide derived from Neem tree 
seeds. 
The decision came after a two-day hearing in Munich and capped a dogged 
six-year campaign by the New Delhi-based Research Foundation, headed by 
scientist Vandana Shiva, and other activists against biopiracy. 
"It's a very, very significant decision. It's the first absolute striking 
down of a patent on biopiracy grounds in the heart of Europe," Shiva told 
IANS here.
She said she had been told by officials of the EPO in advance of the 
ruling that the Office would have to "revisit" its entire system of 
examining and awarding patents if the activists won their case against the 
Neem patent.
"Patent examiners at present have no idea what they are signing. For 
instance, they have no idea what is the Neem tree," Shiva said. "This will 
create the kind of stringency we have been calling for in examining and 
awarding patents." 
An EPO panel judged that there was no inventive steps involved behind the 
patent jointly registered in the name of the USDA and W.R. Grace, a 
chemical manufacturer, after hearing expert testimony on the prior use of 
the Neem as a fungicide in India.
The Research Foundation and its partners in the Neem patent challenge had 
been confident of their case since it was a clear case of piracy of Indian 
indigenous knowledge, according to Shiva.
"How could the United States or W.R. Grace say they invented something 
which has been in public use for centuries and on which modern scientific 
research has been carried out in the country for decades?" she said.
Shiva said the European victory was not the end of the story. The 
activists would take their challenge now to the United States where they 
face a tougher task. Unlike Europe, there is no room for public interest 
intervention on patents in the U.S.
"We are not going to sit quietly. We plan to start an infringement 
conflict in the United States," Shiva said. Activists would encourage 
cooperatives to start marketing Neem tree products in the U.S. If 
W.R. Grace or the USDA does not challenge the marketing, the patent risks 
becoming null and void, she said.



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post