[26] in Kakapo Windows Team
Re: Meeting tomorrow, I presume? + Agenda suggestions
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jonathon Weiss)
Wed Jul 9 16:27:00 2003
Message-Id: <200307092026.h69KQwPj008064@station-10.events.itd.umich.edu>
From: Jonathon Weiss <jweiss@MIT.EDU>
To: Kerem B Limon <kerem.limon@MIT.EDU>
cc: Kakapos at MIT <kakapo@MIT.EDU>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 09 Jul 2003 13:23:52 EDT."
<5.2.0.9.2.20030709131338.07c1d250@hesiod>
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2003 16:26:58 -0400
> 1) On handling container requests and tracking them: We had a short
> discussion on this last time we met, and there was some discussion as to
> whether Ops would/could use CaseTracker, which seems to be the tool of
> choice from the win.mit.edu and DART side. I would like to vote for
> CaseTracker, however, I'd also like to understand and be mindful of
> Jonathon's team and their procedures, since this task seems to be shifting
> to their area.
Unfortunately, I'm out of town this week, and next, and for the
obviously reason, would like to be around for this discussion. Is
this something we can postpone fore a couple of weeks or is it really
urgent that a decision is made right away? I gather it's the former.
It would be useful to me if someone could explain to me what people
hope to get by using casetracker, so I have a better idea of what the
requirements are. I think I got part of this at the meeting two weeks
ago, but don't feel like I have a full handle on it.
I also wouldn't mind an oppertunity to confirm that everyone expects
that container request processing is something that my group is
picking up. It has long been my expectation that this would be the
case, but I know other people have had other expectations, and I don't
know if that's been totally resolved.
Jonathon
