[465] in Info-AFS_Redistribution
[daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU : new afs lists]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Calvin Clark)
Thu Nov 21 03:42:32 1991
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 91 03:42:38 -0500
From: Calvin Clark <ckclark@Athena.MIT.EDU>
To: marc@Athena.MIT.EDU
Cc: info-afs@Athena.MIT.EDU
Reply-To: ckclark@mit.edu
In-Reply-To: [0464]
>Would people complain if I had info-afs@athena.mit.edu added to the
>lists at transarc?
I, for one, am sick of hearing about NeXTs on info-afs, and I would
rather that a new discuss meeting be created for the NeXT list if it
looks like it will have any traffic at all. I'd like to see some of the
Kerberos stuff, though, but I wouldn't object to that being
redistributed to a separate local list/meeting, either. (Yes, I'm
against the unecessary proliferations of discuss meetings as much as the
next guy, but in this case I think that it would be a bad idea to lump
all of TransArc's lists into this meeting. Take a look at the bug-emacs
meeting for an example of the kind of problem that can occur if too many
lists feed one meeting.)
