[301] in Info-AFS_Redistribution
No subject found in mail header
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Network News)
Wed Aug 28 21:09:12 1991
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 91 21:02:31 EDT
From: Network News <usenet@usenet.rpi.edu>
To: rpi-mail-afs@usenet.rpi.edu
Newsgroups: rpi.mail.afs
Path: usenet
From: gad@eclipse.its.rpi.edu (Garance A. Drosehn)
Subject: Re: NeXT and AFS
Message-ID: <8q8md-#@rpi.edu>
Nntp-Posting-Host: eclipse.its.rpi.edu
References: <9A6DAE708020217D@ROSEVC.Rose-Hulman.Edu>
Date: 29 Aug 91 01:02:19 GMT
Lines: 22
Monnin@rosevc.rose-hulman.edu writes:
>
> We are working on installing AFS on a number of NeXT computers
> here at Rose-Hulman. I have found a few "differences" in using
> the NeXT with AFS versus NFS (or a local hard disk). For example,
> the NeXT recycler doesn't seem to work on AFS directories.
>
> Does anyone else have other "gotcha's" for the NeXT?
I'd be interested in any info on AFS on NeXT info too. Once a few other
projects are out of the way I'll be putting AFS up on this Nextstation in my
office. Other people on campus may want it too, if it works out OK.
One question I had was whether there is any issues that come up between the
AFS changes and the recent changes to NextStep 2.1. Do the AFS changes
assume you are running 2.1, or 2.0, or does it not care which you are
running?
- - - - - - - -
Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@eclipse.its.rpi.edu
ITS Systems Programmer (handles NeXT-type mail)
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Troy NY USA
