[119276] in Cypherpunks
Re: IP: [FP] California inaugurates digital signatures - cnn.com
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (bram)
Wed Oct 20 21:45:52 1999
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 1999 18:14:36 -0700 (PDT)
From: bram <bram@gawth.com>
To: Robert Hettinga <rah@shipwright.com>
cc: cryptography@c2.net, cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
In-Reply-To: <v04210158b432f789292c@[204.167.101.62]>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9910201813070.815-100000@ultra.gawth.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: bram <bram@gawth.com>
On Wed, 20 Oct 1999, Robert Hettinga wrote:
> "Lie in X.509, Go to Jail", pt. 2
>
> [snip]
I don't don't understand what the big deal is - fraud is fraud, even if
it's in plaintext email. Making digital signatures have the same legal
staatus as physical signatures doesn't change that at all.
-Bram
