| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 1999 20:11:13 +0200 (CEST) From: Lucky Green <shamrock@cypherpunks.to> To: Jim Spaude <jspaude@teltrend.com> cc: cypherpunks@algebra.com In-Reply-To: <001a01bef55a$4d9191c0$5c060059@jspaude> Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9909022001490.29521-100000@pakastelohi.cypherpunks.to> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Reply-To: Lucky Green <shamrock@cypherpunks.to> On Thu, 2 Sep 1999, Jim Spaude wrote: [From CDT press release] > (4) CDT EXAMINES APPEAL > > CDT had believed that CALEA was a balanced statute. We had accepted the > FBI Director's assurances that the statute would not be used as a mandate > for cell phone tracking, and we had believed that the FCC would resist any > FBI efforts to dictate surveillance enhancements. Not there is a need for further evidence, but on the off-chance that anybody doubts that CDT is highly politically naive, their latest statement speaks for itself: "we had accepted the FBI Director's assurances". That's just priceless. What tree did these people crawl down from? What are they doing in DC? Providing food for the predators? Still chuckling, -- Lucky Green <shamrock@cypherpunks.to> PGP v5 encrypted email preferred.
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |