[117144] in Cypherpunks

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: a wee bit o' ultraparanoia (http://www.inet-one.com/cypherpunks/current/msg0028

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Gary Jeffers)
Fri Aug 27 03:33:49 1999

Message-ID: <000001bef06c$059779e0$45c7a5d0@jeffers>
From: "Gary Jeffers" <jeffers@htc.net>
To: <cypherpunks@cyberpass.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 1999 02:07:43 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000D_01BEF030.F2C8E0A0"
Reply-To: "Gary Jeffers" <jeffers@htc.net>

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_000D_01BEF030.F2C8E0A0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


    -----Original Message-----
    From: Gary Jeffers <jeffers@htc.net>
    To: jeffers@htc.net <jeffers@htc.net>
    Date: Friday, August 27, 1999 12:05 AM
    Subject: a wee bit o' ultraparanoia =
(http://www.inet-one.com/cypherpunks/current/msg0028
   =20
   =20
   =20
   =20
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
---   =20
    [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread =
Index]=20
    a wee bit o' ultraparanoia

-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
---   =20
   =20
        a.. To: cypherpunks@toad.com=20
        b.. Subject: a wee bit o' ultraparanoia=20
        c.. From: Anonymous <nobody@replay.com>=20
        d.. Date: Fri, 27 Aug 1999 07:05:44 +0200 (CEST)=20
        e.. Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender =
address above.It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer =
software.Please report problems or inappropriate use to theremailer =
administrator at <abuse@replay.com>.=20
        f.. Old-Subject: a wee bit o' ultraparanoia=20
        g.. Sender: owner-cypherpunks@Algebra.COM=20
   =20
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
---   =20
   =20
>>	This makes verifying the binaries a SERIOUSLY non-trivial=20
>>task, and makes comparing them utterly useless without going thru=20
>>them byte by byte, and then you STILL may miss a clever compromise.
>
>The fact that it is not trivial is NOT a reason.  Somebody with the =
energy,=20

Nobody, here, seems to have a great post. I can't understand the details =

and probably few others can - Unless they are computer engineers. I =
shall=20
interrogate:

Gents,
if you have a bit-carrier which is trusted (e.g., a floppy or an iButton
ring) then you can
what's an iButton ring?

verify other pieces of code, and bootstrap yourself into a fully =
verified OS.

The military trusts their suppliers, and enforces strict discipline over =

ownership chains.  Mere businessfolk buy COTS and use the =
physically-separate=20
bitcarrier PK verification technique.

What are COTS and what is a PK verification technique?

If you don't trust prefabbed hardware, buy a PLD and configure your own.

What's a PLD?
.....

If the device which encrypts is with you all the time, its very hard to
mess with it.  Think Moore's law.  PalmDogTag?  Woof.

.....

Michael Faraday and his newborne babes are your friends.

Note: The above may help with defense against malice software, but could =
it help
defend against malice hardware?

I realize that my questions are unworthy, but Worthly people have not =
yet implemented
technologies that make me feel that the State is stopped from computer =
tyranny.



Yours Truly,
Gary Jeffers
BEAT STATE!!!






   =20
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
---   =20
   =20
        a.. Prev by Date: Let the eat entropy!=20
        b.. Next by Date: No Subject=20
        c.. Prev by thread: Petro, please put me in your kill file...=20
        d.. Next by thread: guns, germs, bits=20
        e.. Index(es):=20
            a.. Date=20
            b.. Thread=20

------=_NextPart_000_000D_01BEF030.F2C8E0A0
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>

<META content=3Dtext/html;charset=3Diso-8859-1 =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type><TITLE>a wee bit o' =
ultraparanoia</TITLE><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 =
HTML//EN"><BASE=20
href=3Dhttp://www.inet-one.com/cypherpunks/current/msg00289.html><!-- =
MHonArc v2.2.0 --><!--X-Subject: a wee bit o' ultraparanoia =
--><!--X-From: Anonymous <nobody@replay.com> --><!--X-Date:  Fri, 27 Aug =
1999 13:33:23 +0800 --><!--X-Message-Id: =
199908270505.HAA24679@mail.replay.com --><!--X-ContentType: text/plain =
--><!--X-Head-End--><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML//EN"><LINK=20
href=3D"mailto:nobody@replay.com" rev=3Dmade>
<META content=3D'"MSHTML 4.72.3110.7"' name=3DGENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: =
5px">
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><B>-----Original =
Message-----</B><BR><B>From:=20
    </B>Gary Jeffers &lt;<A=20
    href=3D"mailto:jeffers@htc.net">jeffers@htc.net</A>&gt;<BR><B>To: =
</B><A=20
    href=3D"mailto:jeffers@htc.net">jeffers@htc.net</A> &lt;<A=20
    href=3D"mailto:jeffers@htc.net">jeffers@htc.net</A>&gt;<BR><B>Date:=20
    </B>Friday, August 27, 1999 12:05 AM<BR><B>Subject: </B>a wee bit o' =

    ultraparanoia (<A=20
    =
href=3D"http://www.inet-one.com/cypherpunks/current/msg0028">http://www.i=
net-one.com/cypherpunks/current/msg0028</A><BR><BR></DIV></FONT>
    =
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><!--X-Body-Begin--><!--X-User-Header--><!--X-User-Header=
-End--><!--X-TopPNI-->
    <HR>
    [<A href=3D"msg00288.html">Date Prev</A>][<A =
href=3D"msg00290.html">Date=20
    Next</A>][<A href=3D"msg00287.html">Thread Prev</A>][<A=20
    href=3D"msg00291.html">Thread Next</A>][<A =
href=3D"maillist.html#00289">Date=20
    Index</A>][<A href=3D"index.html#00289">Thread =
Index</A>]<!--X-TopPNI-End--><!--X-MsgBody--><!--X-Subject-Header-Begin--=
>=20
    <H1>a wee bit o' ultraparanoia</H1>
    <HR>
<!--X-Subject-Header-End-->
    <UL>
        <LI><EM>To</EM>: <A=20
        href=3D"mailto:cypherpunks@toad.com">cypherpunks@toad.com</A>=20
        <LI><EM>Subject</EM>: a wee bit o' ultraparanoia=20
        <LI><EM>From</EM>: Anonymous &lt;<A=20
        href=3D"mailto:nobody@replay.com">nobody@replay.com</A>&gt;=20
        <LI><EM>Date</EM>: Fri, 27 Aug 1999 07:05:44 +0200 (CEST)=20
        <LI><EM>Comments</EM>: This message did not originate from the =
Sender=20
        address above.It was remailed automatically by anonymizing =
remailer=20
        software.Please report problems or inappropriate use to =
theremailer=20
        administrator at &lt;abuse@replay.com&gt;.=20
        <LI><EM>Old-Subject</EM>: a wee bit o' ultraparanoia=20
        <LI><EM>Sender</EM>: <A=20
        =
href=3D"mailto:owner-cypherpunks@Algebra.COM">owner-cypherpunks@Algebra.C=
OM</A>=20
        </LI></UL><!--X-Head-Body-Sep-Begin-->
    <HR>
<!--X-Head-Body-Sep-End--><!--X-Body-of-Message--><PRE>&gt;&gt;	This =
makes verifying the binaries a SERIOUSLY non-trivial=20
&gt;&gt;task, and makes comparing them utterly useless without going =
thru=20
&gt;&gt;them byte by byte, and then you STILL may miss a clever =
compromise.
&gt;
&gt;The fact that it is not trivial is NOT a reason.  Somebody with the =
energy, </PRE><PRE>
Nobody, here, seems to have a great post. I can't understand the details =
</PRE><PRE>and probably few others can - Unless they are computer =
engineers. I shall </PRE><PRE>interrogate:</PRE><PRE>
Gents,
if you have a bit-carrier which is trusted (e.g., a floppy or an iButton
ring) then you can</PRE><PRE>what's an iButton ring?</PRE><PRE>
verify other pieces of code, and bootstrap yourself into a fully =
verified OS.

The military trusts their suppliers, and enforces strict discipline over =

ownership chains.  Mere businessfolk buy COTS and use the =
physically-separate=20
bitcarrier PK verification technique.
</PRE><PRE>What are COTS and what is a PK verification =
technique?</PRE><PRE>
If you don't trust prefabbed hardware, buy a PLD and configure your =
own.</PRE><PRE>
What's a PLD?
.....

If the device which encrypts is with you all the time, its very hard to
mess with it.  Think Moore's law.  PalmDogTag?  Woof.

.....

Michael Faraday and his newborne babes are your friends.
</PRE><PRE>Note: The above may help with defense against malice =
software, but could it help</PRE><PRE>defend against malice =
hardware?</PRE><PRE>
I realize that my questions are unworthy, but Worthly people have not =
yet implemented</PRE><PRE>technologies that make me feel that the State =
is stopped from computer tyranny.



Yours Truly,</PRE><PRE>Gary Jeffers</PRE><PRE>BEAT STATE!!!





</PRE><!--X-Body-of-Message-End--><!--X-MsgBody-End--><!--X-Follow-Ups-->=

    <HR>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End--><!--X-References--><!--X-References-End--><!--X-Bo=
tPNI-->
    <UL>
        <LI>Prev by Date: <STRONG><A href=3D"msg00288.html">Let the eat=20
        entropy!</A></STRONG>=20
        <LI>Next by Date: <STRONG><A href=3D"msg00290.html">No=20
        Subject</A></STRONG>=20
        <LI>Prev by thread: <STRONG><A href=3D"msg00287.html">Petro, =
please put me=20
        in your kill file...</A></STRONG>=20
        <LI>Next by thread: <STRONG><A href=3D"msg00291.html">guns, =
germs,=20
        bits</A></STRONG>=20
        <LI>Index(es):=20
        <UL>
            <LI><A =
href=3D"maillist.html#00289"><STRONG>Date</STRONG></A>=20
            <LI><A href=3D"index.html#00289"><STRONG>Thread</STRONG></A> =

        =
</LI></UL></LI></UL><!--X-BotPNI-End--><!--X-User-Footer--><!--X-User-Foo=
ter-End--></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_000D_01BEF030.F2C8E0A0--


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post