[9707] in Commercialization & Privatization of the Internet
Re: Some Thoughts on The National Science Board
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Gordon Cook)
Mon Jan 17 14:00:46 1994
From: cook@path.net (Gordon Cook)
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 1994 18:49:57 GMT
Apparently-To: <com-priv@psi.com>
As I quit clearly showed yesterday with the science board I am
questioning the efficacy of a PROCESS. Sean McLinden with his remarks about
certain weaknesses of the PEER review process did an excellent job of
shedding some light on some weaknesses of the PROCESS being used.
Why don't you all offer a defense of the PROCESS, rather than shifting
the debate to the areas of PERSONAL attacks? Or if you insist on doing
the latter, why not come up with some *specific* example of what bothers
you?
