[9095] in Commercialization & Privatization of the Internet

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: The Buffalo Free-Net / NYSERNet / PSI problems

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Martin L. Schoffstall)
Thu Dec 16 18:29:42 1993

Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1993 18:31:43 +0000
From: "Martin L. Schoffstall" <schoff@psi.com>
To: Dave Bachmann <bachmann@austin.ibm.com>, com-priv@psi.com
Cc: nadeaut@psi.com


Yes we do have a position.  But I'm sure that it will be a controversial.

It boils down to the fact that we sell retail connections for the most part, 
and this connection was and is a retail connection to another party.

First for some facts to remove some misconceptions:

 - we were never a provider of service to Buffalo FREENet

 - contacting them was not part of the program as they were not
	our customer, SUNY Buffalo was (through NYSERNet), NYSERNet was
	contacted and this was a long term discussion

 - the goal (and as far as we can tell what happened) was not to
	disturb the paying customer, SUNY Buffalo

- we had discussed the Buffalo FREENET situation for many months with
	NYSERNet

- we were meeting with NYSERNet the morning we turned them off, though
	they were not the reason for meeting, nor more than a few minute
	discussion

- Buffalo FREENET was turned back on Saturday morning, I remember it because
	I had to wrestle my beeper out of my two year old's hands as we were
	driving in the truck to buy a new deer rifle:  that would be 3 days
	if we started on Thursday, though I believe that date is also incorrect

- we were the ones that suggest FREENET go elsewhere, both prior to this, and 
	suggested the criteria to get them back on immediately

- up until this event we believed that NYSERNet was behind our position and
	policy, all discussions prior led us to believe that.  that day's face
	to face even reinforced that.  but the email following it was
	definitely different!

- we had wanted to do this much earlier but up until the week before were
	not 100% sure that the customer traffic wouldn't be affected, so we
	delayed (undoubtedly too long)

- as part of one of our services we offer free dialups to students and faculty
	of our customers throughout the US as they travel, vacation or
	whatever.  BuffaloFreeNet people were using capability
	removing the resource from our customers.


PSI has had a few similiar situations, all of which have been handled
in a similiar fashion.  We talk to the customer first, well before any
action is taken.  Those that attach through some technical means are at risk,
but they put themselves at risk.


There are many people that want something for nothing. Last night I began
reading "Lenin's Tomb, the Last days of the Soviet Empire", chapter one
discusses some examples of this and the implications on (Soviet) society.
Possibly FREENet's are an example of this?


I'm sure none of this is Politically Correct (PC), but PC issues dominate
politics they don't have to dominate society, economic systems, or 
institutions outside of the BeltWay.

Marty


> Message-Id: <9312152002.AA06588@rampage.psi.net> 
> Date:         Wed, 15 Dec 1993 10:42:34 -0500 
> Reply-To: "Communet: Community and Civic Network Discussion List"  <
>             COMMUNET%UVMVM.BITNET@uga.cc.uga.edu>, 
>         Jim Gerland - Network Consultant <GERLAND%UBVMS.BITNET@uga.cc.
> uga.edu> Sender: "Communet: Community and Civic Network Discussion 
> List"  
>             <COMMUNET%UVMVM.BITNET@uga.cc.uga.edu> 
> >From: Jim Gerland - Network Consultant <GERLAND%UBVMS.BITNET@uga.cc.
> >uga.edu> 
> Organization: University at Buffalo 
> Subject:      The Buffalo Free-Net / NYSERNet / PSI problems - resolved 
> X-To:         communet@uvmvm.BITNET, publib@nysernet.org 
> To: Multiple recipients of list COMMUNET 
> <COMMUNET%UVMVM.BITNET@uga.cc.uga.edu> 
> 
> This message is being sent to COMMUNET & PUBLIB. 
> 
> I am not on either of these lists so if you want me to see your 
> response then send it to me. 
> 
> I have already explained what happened on a few other lists but for the 
> sake of those who have not read it and are interested I will risk 
> boring the uninterested with yet another explanation. 
> 
> Let me start by saying the NYSERNet (and everyone at NYSERNet) has been 
> wonderful and helpful and <put you own best compliment here> during the 
> problems the Buffalo Free-Net had with PSI, Inc. and our Internet 
> connection!!!!!! 
> 
> PSI placed a filter which blocked all BFN access to the Internet on a 
> Thursday afternoon.  We discovered that the next day.  PSI did not 
> advise us ahead of time of their actions. 
> 
> We contacted NYSERNet and they (and our BOD) contected PSI to try and 
> work things out.  The bottom line was that a week later Internet access 
> for the Buffalo Free-Net was once again established.  PSI had granted 
> NYSERNet, the University at Buffalo, and the BFN 60 days to switch the 
> UB/BFN internet connection to another service provider.  NYSERNet is in 
> the process of doing this. 
> 
> That's all I am going to say publicaly or privately. 
> 
> If you have any comments about this, please feel free to let me know. 
> 
> Please *DO NOT* bother the NYSERNet folks about this. 
> 
> Thanks, 
> Jim... 
> 
> Jim Gerland 
> Manager, Network user Support 
> University at Buffalo 
> BoD Buffalo Free-Net 
> BoT National Public Telecomputing Network 
> gerland@ubvms.cc.buffalo.edu 
> 
> 
> ------- End of Forwarded Message 
> 



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post