[9005] in Commercialization & Privatization of the Internet
Re: Your Question about Sprint
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Davis)
Tue Dec 14 17:43:01 1993
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1993 17:41:32 -0500
From: Christopher Davis <ckd@kei.com>
To: <stpeters@dawn.crd.ge.com>
Cc: com-priv@lists.psi.com
DSP> == Dick St Peters <stpeters@spare-parts.crd.ge.com>
DSP> I have put that question to the CIX and received no answer, because
DSP> it is an impossible question to answer. The CIX model is broken.
DSP> There is no nice clean boundary between end users and resellers that
DSP> makes any sense.
3. All members must be legally organized to provide TCP/IP or OSI public
data internetworking services to the public in multiple geographic areas.
[examples of co-ops deleted]
By this clause (see cix.org:/cix/README) neither of your co-op examples
would need to be CIX members, any more than a company that has an internal
network (DEC, for example) would need to be.
Even if they are in "multiple geographic areas" (which your co-ops would,
of course, not be) they are not providing the services *to the public*.
*That* is a sufficiently "nice clean boundary ... that makes ... sense"
(at least IMHO).
--
* Christopher Davis * <ckd@kei.com> * (was <ckd@eff.org>) * MIME * [CKD1] *
"It's 106 ms to Chicago, we've got a full tank of GIFs, half a meg of
hypertext, it's dark, and we're wearing sunglasses." "Click it."