[8359] in Commercialization & Privatization of the Internet

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: IBJ "offer"

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ed Tully)
Tue Nov 16 01:13:15 1993

From: tully@cscns.com (Ed Tully)
To: postman@lists.psi.com (Christopher Locke)
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 93 23:12:17 MST
Cc: com-priv@psi.com
In-Reply-To: <199311160520.AA20428@panix.com>; from "Christopher Locke" at Nov 16, 93 12:20 am

Did I miss something? If you have a bone to pick with michael, please
don't take my time to do it. People bitch about advertising - this is junk
mail! It has absolutely no value to me and would appreciate your taking it
private.

Ed Tully


>  > This isn't the place for this, forgive me, but I must
repond to > that "bold offer" by Michael Strangelove, which also didn't
> belong here. 
> 
>  > Attention Subscribers of Internet Business Report
>  > or Internet Letter
>  > 
>  > Flushed with their continued international success, the
>  > publishers of THE INTERNET BUSINESS JOURNAL are presently
>  > offering you a free three month trial subscription to THE
>  > INTERNET BUSINESS JOURNAL.
> 
> Flushed with *something* anyway...  
> 
>  > THE INTERNET BUSINESS JOURNAL's premiere issue in June
>  > 1993 attracted the attention of sources such as Business
>  > Week, Fortune, Wired, The Globe and Mail, and since then
>  > continues to set the standard for reporting on Internet
>  > business opportunities and resources.
> 
> Just for the record, I was editor of the Internet Business
> Journal for its premiere issue and had quite a bit to do with
> all that press attention.  I keep encountering my editorial for
> IBJ #1 on gopher servers far and wide.  Also, just for the
> record, I am now editor of Internet Business *Report*, published
> by CMP, and have had no affiliation with Michael Strangelove
> since I made that move.
> 
>  > The editor of THE INTERNET BUSINESS JOURNAL, Michael
>  > Strangelove, explains the reasoning behind this bold free
>  > offer, "We have a product that is guaranteed to be simply
>  > the best, and therefore dare to invite comparison. When
>  > it comes to price, focus, content, and quality, we
>  > continue to set the standard. Success is always imitated,
>  > but why should you settle for smaller, more expensive
>  > products?
> 
> What's the implication here?  It is smaller.  It is more
> expensive.  Also, if I may say so, it's more devoted to issues
> likely to be of interest to a corporate audience trying to frame
> meaningful strategies with respect to the Internet.  This "I'll
> show you mine if you show me yours" routine is silly, Michael.
> Grow up.
> 
> Anybody who wants to see a small, expensive copy of IBR is
> welcome to send *mail* for a sample issue.  Same as it ever was.
> 
>    *******************************************************
>    *        Christopher Locke   CMP Publications, Inc.   *
>    *                   Editor   600 Community Drive      *    
>    * Internet Business Report   Manhasset, NY 11030      *    
>    *   (516) 562-5975 (voice)   (516) 562-7085 (fax)     *    
>    *         clocke@panix.com   clocke@well.sf.ca.us     *    
>    *******************************************************
> 
> 


-- 
Edward J. Tully
Network Training & Consulting
Community News Service
Colorado Springs, CO


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post