[719] in Commercialization & Privatization of the Internet
Let 100 Backbones Bloom!
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (francis%zaphod@gargoyle.uchicago.e)
Fri May 17 22:11:49 1991
Date: Fri, 17 May 91 21:10:30 CDT
From: francis%zaphod@gargoyle.uchicago.edu
To: com-priv@psi.com
In-Reply-To: (stev knowles's message of Fri, 17 May 91 10:32:07 -0400 <9105171432.AA19914@ftp.com>
stev@ftp.com (stev knowles) writes:
>most of the contracts i have seen do not allow the connected sites to pass
>"transit" packets into their systems without permission. if they could get
>permission, i would assume the regionals would do it themselves, to avoid
>having to deal with support calls abotu someone elses link going down.
What, you mean the regionals *can't* act as relays? That seems
odd--what if the backbone goes down or something?
I suppose I can see not wanting them to take that on permanently--it'd
be a waste of resources, since we do have the backbone--but not able
at all seems a bit odd...
Anyway, I think we were talking about privitization of the backbone,
which would be a different story. If the Net were fragmented at the
backbone level, there'd be money for somebody in relaying traffic;
there might be regulations against it, but they'd probably come up
with something around it. (Laws against relatively easy profits are
about as reliable as laws against high tide. :-)
/============================================================================\
| Francis Stracke | My opinions are my own. I don't steal them.|
| Department of Mathematics |=============================================|
| University of Chicago | Earth: Love it or leave it. |
| francis@zaphod.uchicago.edu | |
\============================================================================/
