|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 91 14:35:12 -0500 From: wls@psi.com (William Schrader) To: bzs@world.std.com, com-priv@psi.com, nren-discuss@psi.com Cc: wls@psi.com The interest (heat?) created on com-priv, Kidsnet, and nren-discuss about the advantages and problems of applying Internet technology and services to school children is wonderful. I agree, in whole or in part, with much of that said previously and wish to add the following 2 screens of thoughts. America has a tradition of individual decisions for individuals, and "democratic" decisions for civic organizations (states, cities, school districts). "Democratic" is so modified due to difficulties experienced by voters (individually or collectively) in exerting serious and/or specific control over the BUDGET. We must watch-the-money, since all else can usually be seen through where the money flows (priorities, control, definitions of "winners and losers", etc.). Since few of us have control over states, cities, or school boards, what we (the network users, providers, policy makers) need to do is: make this technology and service available to them and let them decide their own priorities. Do not presume to know, better than they, what they should, or will, do; either in the short-term or the long-term. Further, it is our responsibility to maintain the Freedom of Action which we have enjoyed in helping to build the worldwide Internet and extend a similar Freedom of Action, to the extent K-12'ers wish, to any and all new entrants. This means they should have the same access as others who wish to make the necessary resource commitment. Commercial providers of internetworking service may select to build and offer services which address the needs of K-12. It is also the option of the Non-Profit Regional Networks to do the same. Perhaps some of the debate centers on whether it is the _responsibility_ of the Non-Profit Regionals Networks to service the K-12'ers? PSI has been public about its commitment to provide service to smaller organizations, and this includes the technology, and the reliable service, and the training, and the user support which goes along with K-12 customers. We also do this at costs as low as $25/month. And, we _do_ understand that many shools cannot afford the $25, nor the local phone call to our POP, nor the modem, nor the software costs, but that is _their_ decision based on _their_ priorities. We are simply offering the service and doing the best job possible once they make that decision. I hope that the level of interest in this topic continues and results in a greater focus on action of some kind by those who have engaged in the debate. Bill Schrader President & CEO PSI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |