[10145] in Commercialization & Privatization of the Internet

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Not even for transit to the CIX?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Karl Denninger)
Tue Feb 8 22:19:46 1994

From: karl@mcs.com (Karl Denninger)
To: doug@lm.net (Doug Luce)
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 1994 20:58:51 -0600 (CST)
Cc: com-priv@psi.com
In-Reply-To: <Pine.3.07.9402081905.X230-a100000@epicycle.lm.com> from "Doug Luce" at Feb 8, 94 07:15:05 pm

> When inquiring about PSI's dedicated IP services, I was told that PSI
> would not sell to Telerama.  The sales representative explained that
> Telerama represents competition.  Upon pressing further, and mentioning
> PSI's other competitors, I was treated with a rant that began "but they
> don't own their own backbone...and one day we will expand our
> services...we're running cable in beta throughout Cambridge...oh, we're
> not...you're sure...but the press release...the...oh...rosebud...rosebud...."
> 
> (Note that I did not speak a word throughout the above quoted monologue.)

Talk to Sprint.  Not only do they ALSO have their own backbone, but they
act like a phone company with it.

Unlike other players you have come into contact with.

A "traceroute" on mcs.com should confirm this statement.

--
--
Karl Denninger (karl@MCS.COM) 	| MCSNet - Full Internet Connectivity (shell,
Modem: [+1 312 248-0900]	| PPP, SLIP and more) in Chicago and 'burbs.  
Voice/FAX: [+1 312 248-8649]	| Email "info@mcs.com".  MCSNet is a CIX member.

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post