[1328] in bugtraq
Re: Non-PK encryption not vulnerable via low key length?!
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John F. Haugh II)
Sat Mar 25 11:18:11 1995
From: jfh@rpp386.cactus.org (John F. Haugh II)
To: smb@research.att.com
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 95 8:18:39 CST
Cc: softtest@wu1.wl.aecl.ca, elfchief@lupine.org, entropy@IntNet.net,
vishy@sph.umich.edu, bugtraq@fc.net
In-Reply-To: <199503171535.JAA09068@freeside.fc.net>; from "smb@research.att.com" at Mar 17, 95 10:11 am
> RC2 and RC4 are both trade secrets of RSA Data Security, Inc. A
> bootleg version of RC4 was posted to the net last year; from everything
> I've heard, including some comments from Jim Bidzos, the president of
> RSADSI, it was the real thing.
If they are both trade secrets, then they aren't elligible for patent
protection -- sauce for the gander.
Does anyone on this list have the RC4 source or a pointer to it?
--
John F. Haugh II [ NRA-ILA ] [ Kill Barney ] !'s: ...!cs.utexas.edu!rpp386!jfh
Ma Bell: (512) 251-2151 [GOP][DoF #17][PADI][ENTJ] @'s: jfh@rpp386.cactus.org