[1330] in bugtraq
Re: Non-PK encryption not vulnerable via low key length?!
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Software Test Account)
Sat Mar 25 18:21:58 1995
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 1995 16:03:15 -0600 (CST)
From: Software Test Account <softtest@wu1.wl.aecl.ca>
In-Reply-To: <199503252030.MAA18289@infinity.c2.org>
To: sameer <sameer@c2.org>
Cc: "John F. Haugh II" <jfh@rpp386.cactus.org>, smb@research.att.com,
elfchief@lupine.org, entropy@IntNet.net, vishy@sph.umich.edu,
bugtraq@fc.net
On Sat, 25 Mar 1995, sameer wrote:
> ftp.csua.berkeley.edu:/pub/cypherpunks/ciphers/rc4.c
> ftp.csua.berkeley.edu:/pub/cypherpunks/ciphers/rc4.h
>
>
That's all there is to the routine?
Surely there is more to creating such a secure key?
Just a hunch?
Erik
____ _____ _______ __ Erik Lindquist
/ _ | / ___/ / _____/ / / Systems Administrator
/ /_| | / /__ / / / / AECL Whiteshell Laboratories
/ __ | / ___/ / / / / VOICE: (204) 753-2311x3145
/ / | | / /____ / /_____ / /_____ FAX: (204) 753-2455
/_/ |_| /______/ /_______/ /________/ E-mail: lindquie@wu1.wl.aecl.ca
