| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 19:32:00 -0400 (EDT) From: Jonathan Reed <jdreed@MIT.EDU> To: Evan Broder <broder@mit.edu> cc: Debathena Trac <debathena@mit.edu>, jhawk@mit.edu, geofft@mit.edu In-Reply-To: <49D69B72.9020602@mit.edu> Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0904031930580.21174@infinite-loop.mit.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, Evan Broder wrote: > Jonathan Reed wrote: >> There seems to be some thought that the -clients metapackage contains >> some sort of implied "Touch my machine as little as possible" contract >> with its users. If that's the intention of the developers, we should >> document that or something. > > Like I said on zephyr, and like I don't feel like more than summarizing > here, I think we're at a point that we need to fundamentally sit down > and think about how package selection and metapackages work on Debathena. Agreed. > That being said, if we continue to try and stretch the current model, I > think it would be potentially reasonable for -clients to not touch your > system, and have -standard divert and configure stuff. We'd want to move > a few other packages (i.e. -printing-config) into -standard if we do that. That sounds perfectly reasonable to me, and brings things in like with -standard being the "base" model for support (anything "lower" than that, and we'll still help you, but you get to keep both pieces) -Jon
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |