[15615] in athena10
Re: Status of Debathena address migration?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Alex Chernyakhovsky)
Mon Apr 16 18:37:13 2018
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20180416183401.0b5fdddc@mit.edu>
From: Alex Chernyakhovsky <achernya@mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 18:36:50 -0400
Message-ID: <CAB18ysqxvoYK+wd-+qDn0VKhHpkvvN9P=bc+Q-CF9mnpoviBmg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Cel Skeggs <cela@mit.edu>
Cc: Jonathan Reed <jdreed@gmail.com>, debathena-root@mit.edu,
Debathena Trac <debathena@mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Debuild hardware was re-purposed in 2010 and abandoned shortly
thereafter. It was an ancient officehead workstation 3 generations
reused to begin with.
I have no objection to deleting the hostname record.
Sincerely,
-Alex
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 6:34 PM, Cel Skeggs <cela@mit.edu> wrote:
> A couple questions:
>
> - Does debuild have associated hardware that should be
> decomissioned/repurposed?
> - Is the hostname useful enough that it should continue to exist
> beyond the life of the server, or should I delete the moira record?
>
> Cel
>
> On Mon, 16 Apr 2018 18:29:40 -0400
> Jonathan Reed <jdreed@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> debuild should be nuked from orbit (it's the only way to be sure!),
>> because was deprecated many years ago in favor of zulu (which is an
>> IS&T VM).
>>
>> Allegedly glasgall will be taking care of neutron-star and
>> package-fusion, and achernya will be doing something with
>> hecatoncheires.
>>
>> -Jon
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 6:13 PM, Cel Skeggs <cela@mit.edu> wrote:
>> > Hi Debathena team,
>> >
>> > I assume you're already aware of the IP renumbering process.
>> >
>> > Your host list, according to our spreadsheet:
>> > - neutron-star
>> > - debuild
>> > - package-fusion
>> > - hecatoncheires
>> >
>> > Do you have migration for these hosts covered?
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > ~ Cel Skeggs
>> > SIPB Vice Chair
>
