[15614] in athena10
Re: Status of Debathena address migration?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Cel Skeggs)
Mon Apr 16 18:35:28 2018
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 18:34:01 -0400
From: Cel Skeggs <cela@mit.edu>
To: Jonathan Reed <jdreed@gmail.com>
Cc: <debathena-root@mit.edu>, <debathena@mit.edu>
Message-ID: <20180416183401.0b5fdddc@mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <CADwaeHdGPX+J93GPvoFGFC-tOgTnDFjaP77EwF7FMUawd6ge9w@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
A couple questions:
- Does debuild have associated hardware that should be
decomissioned/repurposed?
- Is the hostname useful enough that it should continue to exist
beyond the life of the server, or should I delete the moira record?
Cel
On Mon, 16 Apr 2018 18:29:40 -0400
Jonathan Reed <jdreed@gmail.com> wrote:
> debuild should be nuked from orbit (it's the only way to be sure!),
> because was deprecated many years ago in favor of zulu (which is an
> IS&T VM).
>
> Allegedly glasgall will be taking care of neutron-star and
> package-fusion, and achernya will be doing something with
> hecatoncheires.
>
> -Jon
>
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 6:13 PM, Cel Skeggs <cela@mit.edu> wrote:
> > Hi Debathena team,
> >
> > I assume you're already aware of the IP renumbering process.
> >
> > Your host list, according to our spreadsheet:
> > - neutron-star
> > - debuild
> > - package-fusion
> > - hecatoncheires
> >
> > Do you have migration for these hosts covered?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > ~ Cel Skeggs
> > SIPB Vice Chair
