[98] in Tooltime

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Scopus Status Report 5/10/96

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Steven Wade Neiterman)
Fri May 10 14:04:52 1996

Date: Fri, 10 May 1996 14:05:46 -0400
To: tooltime@MIT.EDU
From: wade@MIT.EDU (Steven Wade Neiterman)
Cc: pakulat@MIT.EDU, endriga@MIT.EDU, jwl@MIT.EDU, tarnett@MIT.EDU

Scopus Implementation
Date: May 10,1996


Working On Milestone:

-   Requirements phase scheduled for nine days, and scheduled to be complete by
    Tuesday, May 10th. This includes Prototype and Functional Specification.

-   Project has slipped three days as compared to original project plan.
    Project plan had been revised and functional specification sign-off
    is now scheduled for May 16.

Accomplishments:

-   Completed and achieved sign-off for data entry and lookup screens
-   Completed load of demo data
-   Completed meeting with database group to review outstanding issues
-   Corrected SQL*Net problem on database machine (last week status issue)
-   Completed initial assessment of data risks (last week status issue)
-   Began functional specification
-   Began initial conversation with data warehouse on issues
-   Began investigation into Windows client deployment

Goals:

-  Review rough first draft of functional specification, define process
   to give feedback, produce final version on May 16.
-  Complete first draft of design specification on May 17.
-  Install metadata tables to facilitate client startup
-  Complete Windows client deployment installation
-  Setup accounts for tooltime
-  Review first draft storybook, scope statement for new business document

Issues:

-  Scopus QA people working on Macintosh issues with SQL*Net 2.1
   certification, missing VMNU object, slow performance (escalated issue
   on May 9th).

Concerns:

-  Total consulting days charged is 9 days.  Long hours were put in this
   week resulting in 6 days of effort.  If this continues, we will exceed
   our consulting contract earlier than expected.

-  Progress on obtaining specifications for new production machine is moving
   forward, but behind schedule.  June 1 appears to be critical date to
   obtain machine for prepping and testing.

-  Learned that data privacy principles address archival of data, which
   applies to log information.  We need to evaluate impact.

Learning's:

-  It's difficult to move away from an existing process and technology
   solution, especially when effort has been applied to make the system work.

-  Reaching consensus on the process and definition of core business
   requirements for the first release may have been enhanced with a preliminary
   requirements document.  This document would have a set of design principles,
   generate clarity on process, and separate features into "must-have" and
   "nice-to-have".  It would generate multiple thresholds for must-have
   performance and assess trade-offs related to time and cost.




home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post