[376] in Tooltime

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: more comments on latest scopus offering

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Steven Wade Neiterman)
Fri Jan 24 17:24:58 1997

In-Reply-To: <9701242218.AA12449@helpdesk3.MIT.EDU>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 1997 17:28:23 +0100
To: Rob Smyser <smyser@MIT.EDU>, tooltime@MIT.EDU
From: Steven Wade Neiterman <wade@MIT.EDU>

Thanks for testing.

Maybe the developer folks can comment on the first item.  My testing has
been on Solaris and SGI, and those platforms seem to be ok - interms of
width.

Regarding item b., we made a few changes before we settled on the
YYYY/MM/DD format.  I agree, it seems to do work nicely.

..Steve

At 5:18 PM -0500 1/24/97, Rob Smyser wrote:
>- results set date field "Created On"...
>
>  a.) the field comes out five miles wide compared with its contents.
>      If the field is specified in characters, we can be pretty sure it's
>      only 20 characters wide.
>
>  b.) at our meeting steve said that sorting in the field made no sense.
>      The field seems to be YYYY/MM/DD HH:MM:SS, which presents no problem
>      with sorting that I can tell.  It groups first by year, then month,
>      then day....  Just what one would expect.  I don't see a problem.
>
>  c.) setting date formats in File / Preferences... has no effect on this
>      field.
>
>If we can narrow the default field width to a reasonable value, then we
>can go with it as it now works.
>
>-----------
>   Rob Smyser      Computing Help Desk,  MIT Information Systems, 11-226
>   smyser@mit.edu  (617) 253 1358




home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post