[219] in Tooltime
Re: Draft of Traning Document
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Lynne E. Sousa)
Fri Aug 30 11:26:14 1996
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 1996 11:24:37 -0400
To: wade@MIT.EDU (Steven Wade Neiterman), "Lynne E. Sousa" <sousa@MIT.EDU>,
tooltime@MIT.EDU
From: "Lynne E. Sousa" <sousa@MIT.EDU>
I need some feed back before I can make a new draft. Email to me or
discussion st tooltime on Wedensday should suffice.
At 10:18 AM 8/30/96 +0100, Steven Wade Neiterman wrote:
>At 3:33 PM 8/29/96, Lynne E. Sousa wrote:
>>Steve et al.,
>>Here is the document. The formatting is not perfect. Things need to be
>>discussed.
>>
>
>Lynne, thanks for sending this out. When you say "things need to be
>discussed", do you have specific questions or are you looking for feedback
>from the team?
>
>Based on the schedule, the second draft is due at the end of the day on
>Wednesday 8/4 and the final draft on Friday 8/6.. Do you have enough
>information and feedback (I believe Rob was going to help out) to continue
>working towards this second draft?
>
>At some point, it would be good to have a group review of the document (to
>review hints, organization, items from previous feedback sessions). Should
>this occur prior to the second draft? If you are prepared to continue
>working on the document without a group feedback session, then I would
>propose we meet on Thursday next week (8/5) in the morning. This would
>allow time to produce the final draft the next day. Otherwise, we could
>take the Wednesday tooltime meeting for discussion.
>
>After reading the document, I had some thoughts on organization. For
>example, would a consultant want to read the document via "Functions" as a
>category? A function could be "Creating a New record", "Searching for an
>Existing Record", etc.
>
>..Steve
>
>
>
>
Lynne E. Sousa
Computing Help Desk
11-226A
8-5857
