[500] in Project_DB
Re: Status Value "See Comment"
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Brenda Gillingham)
Tue Jul 6 11:40:09 1999
Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19990706114224.01277780@po7.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 1999 11:42:24 -0400
To: Mike Barker <mbarker@mit.edu>
From: Brenda Gillingham <brendakg@MIT.EDU>
Cc: project-db@mit.edu, ljr@mit.edu, jweiss@mit.edu, jis@mit.edu,
kelley@mit.edu, lisanti@mit.edu
In-Reply-To: <4.1.19990706102142.00d32e30@po11.mit.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Is there any usefulness in letting both values stand together, such as:
"on hold -- see comment" or "terminated -- see comment"?
Are we constrained by anything that requires showing just one
of these values at a time?
Brenda
At 10:24 AM 7/6/99 -0400, Mike Barker wrote:
>The following projects use the status value "See Comment". We had talked
>about using the short list (pending, active, on hold, terminated,
>completed), but I think it may be worthwhile to allow this status value to
>stand, since there may be times when the project does need explanation of
>the status.
>
>Electronic Catalog - ECAT1 conversion - ljr
> Ports from Decstations - jweiss
> SLA for Chemistry Athena Workstations - jis
> VM Release 2.2.0 Upgrade - kelley
> PDF - lisanti
>
>Comments or suggestions?
>
>thanks
>mike
>
>
