[484] in Project_DB
Re: CG Director Comments
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Bill Cattey)
Thu Jun 10 16:52:58 1999
Message-Id: <YrM2KWAGgE6e0XR6U0@mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 16:52:50 -0400 (EDT)
From: Bill Cattey <wdc@MIT.EDU>
To: project-db@MIT.EDU, Mike Barker <mbarker@MIT.EDU>
Cc: miki@MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: <4.1.19990603152550.00c546c0@po11.mit.edu>
Excerpts from pm.pdpd: 3-Jun-99 CG Director Comments Mike Barker@MIT.EDU (980*)
> 5. She tried making a project "formal" to move it from the "informal
> projects" section to the project summary. Nothing happened, as I think
> the move depends on process and/or practice. This is counter-intuitive.
Are we going to try and address this in the present run of modifications?
It is indeed true that the way a project is validated as formal, is if a
director puts it in a process, rather than in setting the FORMAL bit.
-wdc
