[483] in Project_DB
Re: CG Director Comments
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Bill Cattey)
Thu Jun 10 16:50:29 1999
Message-Id: <0rM2ICkGgE6e0XR5w0@mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 16:50:22 -0400 (EDT)
From: Bill Cattey <wdc@MIT.EDU>
To: project-db@MIT.EDU, Mike Barker <mbarker@MIT.EDU>
Cc: miki@MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: <4.1.19990603152550.00c546c0@po11.mit.edu>
Excerpts from pm.pdpd: 3-Jun-99 CG Director Comments Mike Barker@MIT.EDU (980*)
> 3. while there seems to be a process directors list, there doesn't seem
> to be a practice directors list. However, business practice directors
> certainly do have projects that they are running/sponsoring. Should
> (tregan, vkumar, dennis) be added -- maybe to the directors list (and
> quit calling it a process directors list, just call it a directors list?)
When the modifications first began circulating, I proposed this.
Back then it was considered too radical. Perhaps people are converging
on a sense that this is a valuable simplification?
-wdc
